| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19162 | Southern | Nicole | Miller | 3.36 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | Nicole has a 3.36 rating and wants to appeal to 4.0. She won 8. matches and lost 14 at 3.5 this past season. She and her partner scored 168 points and the opponents scored 244. She states her DUPR is 4.078 from the most recent tournament last week. She played 3.0 not 3.5 while her dupr going in was a 3.567. The opponents were an average of 2.98 players. Her rating was artificially inflated by playing down in a league she was over qualified to play in. Her reading in APPL began this year at 3.52 and dropped match over match to 3.36. I feel like the DUPR is not accurate due to sandbagging in 3.0 and the Appl reflects that she did not hold her own in the 3.5 league. I don't recommend the approval as the stats do not warrant it. |
|
| 17867 | West Valley | nony | Riglesberger | 3.46 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 18218 | East Valley | Olivia | Nichols | 3.94 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 3.94 to 4.0 | |
| 18249 | West Valley | Olivia | Nichols | 3.50 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Did not play in 2025 Self rating | |
| 17814 | Southern | Pam | Holmes | 2.89 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Did not play in 2025 due to injury 2024 14 wins 15 losses earned 8 appl points, allowed 5 would have qualified for a fast track appeal. Recommend approval. | |
| 17863 | Southern | Pam | Steube | 2.86 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | After multiple conversations with Pam about a fast track appeal as she qualifies..... Approve the appeal as it really qualifies for a fast track but technology glitches or operator error are making it impossible to submit the appropriate one. | |
| 19039 | West Valley | Pam | Leeming | 2.88 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Didn't play in 2025, only 6 games in 2024 Self rating via Appeal process | |
| 17819 | West Valley | Pamela | Smith | 3.73 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 17959 | Southern | Pat | Hawkins | 4.08 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | He played only one game in 2025. Not even one match. Wants to appeal to 3.5 Both hips replaced with complications afterwards. He will be 64 in 2026 and have to play on a 50+ team. Rating is 4.08 in 2023 he played in 65+ and 55+ age groups. Played with same partner most of the matches. Their ratings were into the 4.0's and other opponents were in 3.75-3.8 on average. He started 2024 at 4.22 in a 3.5 league....I have no idea how that happens. His rating went as high as 4.32. It dropped toward the end of the season to 4.0-4.1 range while in 3.5 league. For the past two years he has played on a 3.5 team with a higher than 4.0 rating...... while he will be the oldest in that age group he also has shown that he can play at 4.0. Does the injury and complication give him the gift of being overrated for a third year in a row???? Last time his rating was below 4.0 2/23 | |
| 18296 | West Valley | Patrick | Hansen | 4.43 | 4.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | did not play in 2025 DUPR recent, and above 4.5 Self rate through appeal | |
| 19316 | West Valley | Patty | Meyer | 4.66 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 18161 | East Valley | Paul | Malley | 3.50 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE Paul has played MXD with his wife as his partner for 3 years. She actually applied for an appeal from 4.07 to 4.0 which we denied. We told her that her partner could apply for an appeal up and would have a better chance for approval. Averages almost 9 PPG | |
| 18847 | West Valley | Paul | Olson | 4.74 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Did not play in 2025 | |
| 17925 | West Valley | Peg | Barcelo | 4.23 | 4.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | RD and LC review and approval. Merger flights in pilot group counted and impacted rating. | |
| 18028 | West Valley | Perri | Guido | 2.95 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 19210 | Southern | Philip | A Isaac | 3.5 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Have Nancy do this appeal 2025 was first season Philip played APPL. Was rated 3.5 (captain's rating); started as 3.70, dropped .20 and ended as 3.5. Played one match (6 games), lost all games, earned only 2 APPL points and was pickled twice. Player believes he more accurately should have started as 3.0 and would like to play on a 65+ 3.0 team in 2026 | |
| 19299 | West Valley | Phyllis | Hubatch | 3.68 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 19333 | West Valley | Rafael | Juarbe | 3.30 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 17759 | Southern | Renee | Craddock | 3.75 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | I am very familiar with this player. I was a sub on her team last year and played with her in two matches. We had never been on the court together before these matches. We did will winning approximately 50% of the games and getting the APPL point in the majority of the games. The team went on to win State. Renee played only four matches all year, two with me and two with a 4.18 player. Their results were similar to mine. At state only one of the matches was reported. Renee played with yet two new partners at state. Renee is a very strong player coming from a high level tennis background. She had her knee replaced two years ago so was unable to play that season. She came back this year very strong. She is one of the players that people like to play with as she understands strategy and is thoughtful about how her shot affect her partner. She drills with me and plays multiple times pers week in round robin play with 4.0 to 4.5 players. Her rating has steadily increased over the years and given the right partnership this year on our team, she will likely raise her rating to over 4.0. I believer her play style and play lever warrant the rating of 4.0 | |
| 17921 | West Valley | Robert | Niedzwiecki | 3.78 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Didn't play in 2025. | |
| 17977 | West Valley | Robert | Marshall | 3.90 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | 3-11 at State | |
| 18007 | Southern | Robert | Salter | 2.83 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Robert played 34 games last yea He lost 24 mens doubles matches, won 3. He lost 4 mixed double and won 3. He earned 6 appl points in mens doubles and allowed 2. He won 3 apple points in mixed and allowed two. He struggled all year with leg issues eventually having surgery to correct it. He states that subs scores might have been attributed to him but I would have know way of knowing if this was accurate. He played in 65+ last year and can do so again this year if he so chooses. In adding up all matches both doubles and mixed his average rating is a 2.9. I believe that he should be granted the appeal based on that, due to the unknown of whose scores are actually entered and no way to find out. If he chooses to play 65+ he is able to regardless. Duper is 3.006 | |
| 19023 | East Valley | Robert | Lynne | 4.07 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE?? Robert called me and has a high blood pressure problem and is worried about playing at the higher level. He did well at 3.5, but could probably stay another year that level. I'm worried about the high blood pressure situation. | |
| 17909 | East Valley | Robin | Castriano | 2.79 | 3.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | REJECT 2.79 TO 3.0 |
|
| 18299 | West Valley | Rodrigo | Perez-Zambrano | 3.6 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | w-7 Lost 11 |
|
| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
Copyright © 2019-2026 Arizona Pickleball Players League Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions |Covid Policy 2022| APPL Internal Resources