| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18128 | Southern | Ron | Jacobsen | 4.53 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Ron played in a 50/65 40 45 mixed league. He plays out of Tubac which has no 4.5 team. Due to the barely over, last match, no place to play in Tubac I ask for approval. Dupr is 4.42. Last match was one year ago. | |
| 18763 | East Valley | RUSSELL | KNIGHT | 3.39 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE Played 3.5 in 25 | |
| 18794 | Southern | Ruth | Neufeld | 3.52 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Ruth is wanting to play 4.0 up from 3.52. At first glance you would think no way. However Her dupr is 3.88. She has 162 wins and 246 losses in her dupr rating. It is a solid rating. Her tournament play shows that she can hang at 4.0. I recommend we grant the appeal. | |
| 17757 | Southern | Sandra | Hubbard | 3.33 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | This player has steadily declined since her start at 3.7 in 2024. She ended the mixed season in 2024 at 3.24. 2025 she played gender doubles and only raised her rating by .09. She played six matches all with the same partner. They won 14 games and lost 22. They scored 4 appl points in their 22 losses and allowed 8 appl points in their 14 wins. Her dupr rating is 3.239 and she has no history in pickleball brackets. I do not believe that the fact that she disagrees with her rating is sufficient to warrant and increased rating for appeal to 3.5 |
|
| 18095 | Southern | Scott | Burbank | 4.06 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Scott wants to appeal down from a 4.06 to a 3.5 which he played at last year. He is over 65 He played all 8 matches. He won 33 games and lost 19. that is a 78% win rate. he has no dupr | |
| 19354 | West Valley | Scott | Moyer | 3.86 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 18874 | East Valley | Sean | Bowers | 4.52 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE Started APPL in '25 as new player at 4.70 INDEX Consistently went down every game till end at 4.52 barely over Sean should have been playing 4.0 last year. His capt rated him at 4.5 as a new player to allow room for others on his 4.5 team. He realized he should be playing 4.0 as the season transpired. | |
| 17892 | West Valley | Selena | Hayes | 3.91 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 18839 | East Valley | Sharon | Bottock | 3.3 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE WON 12 Lost 24 | |
| 17751 | West Valley | Shawna | Dierken | 3.45 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 17832 | West Valley | Shawna | Dierken | 3.45 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 19238 | Southern | Shelann | Lockwood | 3.89 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Shelann did not play in 2025. APPL index from 2024 is 3.89. She wants to play 4.0. She started at 4.0 in 2024 and dropped to a 3.89 but regularly plays with higher level players. I recommend the appeal be approved. | |
| 19329 | West Valley | Sheri | Anthenat | 2.63 | 3.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 17768 | East Valley | Sheri | Wheat | 3.76 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 3.76 to 4.0 Played 4.0 2025 season History support competitive at 4.0 |
|
| 17790 | Southern | Sherry | Elwood | 2.5 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Deny this appeal. Player qualifies for a fast track appeal. Rating is 2.85. Told her this and asked her to submit a fast track appeal. 8/4/25 or approve this one | |
| 19098 | West Valley | Sherry | Harleman | 3.58 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | w 3, l- 18 | |
| 18105 | East Valley | Sheryl | Erickson | 2.72 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 2.72 TO 3.0 | |
| 18238 | East Valley | Sheryl | Erickson | 3.00 | 2.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE | |
| 17812 | West Valley | Steve | West | 3.0 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 17788 | East Valley | Steven | Herrala | 4.06 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | REJECT 4.0 TO 3.5 If his partner is equally or potentially stronger, then maybe his partner needs to appeal to 4.0. Dominated at 3.5, needs to move up |
|
| 18287 | Southern | Sue | Linton | 3.57 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Sue is a 3.57 player who is asking to play down to a 3.0. She is 75 years old and wants to play doubles with her husband who is a 3.0 and is 82 years old. She was quite sick this past spring and has had a hard time recovering. Sue and her husband played together last year in 30 games. They won 22 and lost 8. They gained 6 Appl points and allowed 12. Sue's rating bobbed around all year going between the 3.37 she started with and peaked for one game at 3.6 before going back to a 3.55. While she was over 3.5 most of the season it was usually 3.51, 3.55.... she only hit 3.6 at one time and only for one game of one match. While her husband COULD play up on a 3.5 team due to his age, his ratings are continuously low 3.2. with that being said, is she better than 3.0 yes, at 75 playing a a 65+ should that give her some grace when she plays with an 82 year old partner..... My feelings are if they are husband and wife and can even stand to play together on the same side.... they must be amazing people. I would vote yes based on age. But I realize I am pretty tenderhearted when it come to things like this. | |
| 17919 | Southern | Sue K | Smith | 3.90 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | qualifies as fast track appeal | |
| 19689 | West Valley | Susie | schell | 3.2 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Registered but never played APPL | |
| 17787 | Southern | Suzanne | Richards | 2.8 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | In 2025 Suzanne played both mixed and gender doubles. Gender: Mixed: Dupr is 2.943 She said she played injured last year. Player is 72 years old. The only thing that makes me want to honor the appeal is the injury and the dupr rating. Her wins and loses do not support it but at 72 she is still playing so maybe she earns it by determination. | |
| 17880 | Southern | Suzanne | Richards | 2.8 | 3.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | suzanne started at the given rate of 3.2 and ended at 2.8. Her rating progressed steadily downward. she states she has rotator cuff issues. |
|
| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
