Displaying 251 - 275 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
17923West ValleyDanielSeverino3.714.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17890East ValleyCandaceSharkey4.203.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Candace started 2025 season as a high 3.5 at 3.93
She stayed over 4.0 the entire season and won the majority of games in doubles and mixed.

I would suggest if she wants to play with her same partners they could possibly appeal to 4.0 as they are higher level 3.5 players as well.

Candace will be competitive at 4.0

Her reasoning to stay at 3.5 is to play with the same partners.

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
  • Medical reasoning does not support the Appeal
18110East Valleymarksharkey3.864.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE 3.86 TO 4.0
Fast track player
18052West ValleyLupeShepard3.814.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

W 7, L 17 in 2025 season
APPL Index declined last 2 seasons

DUPR presented has only 4 games and 1% reliability

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17898East Valleymichelleshumaker4.053.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE from 4.05 TO 3.5
Michelle won ONLY 50% of her games at 3.5
21:21
364 WON 368 LOST POINTS
Michelle played 3.0 in 2024, new to 3.5 in 2025.
Michelle did not dominate at 3.5 and another year at 3.5 will prepare her for 4.0 division.

I think Michelle should stay at 3.5 for another year and see how her statistics are next year.
17763West ValleyThierrySimondet4.183.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17841SouthernCurtisSimpson4.534.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Curtis Simpson is one of the players that caused a great deal of complaints last year regarding sandbagging. He played as a captain rated player on a 3.5 tear. He won 95 games and lost 7. At state he won 16 games and lost 3. Regular season saw him score 7 appl points in 7 losses and state had 4 appl points scored in 8 losses. Regular season saw 33 appl points scored against him in 95 wins and 5 appl points in 16 wins at state.

His dupr is 3.956. HOWEVER he plays round robin mixers at an indoor club weekly with rotating partners for that dupr score. His dupr has never been over 4.0. Pb brackets is all blurred out and I cannot see it. I do not recommend approval of the appeal

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18098East Valleyangelsinger3.834.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT
Plays at PICKLR at 4.0
2025 season played 4.0
145W 243L
4W 20L
6PPG

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18957East ValleyAlansinger4.654.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

Self rate 4.0

Hasn't played since knee injury in '23
17819West ValleyPamelaSmith3.734.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17919SouthernSue KSmith3.904.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

qualifies as fast track appeal
19429West ValleyDougSmook4.524.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

did not play last season

played 4.0 in merged higher level flights
17936West ValleyKarinSobotta5.555.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • Player is already at the desired Roster Rating
19332SouthernCarolStarnes3.53.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Carol has not played since 2023. The final match of the season in the final game it bumped her to 4.01 and she wants to play 3.5

I recommend we approve the appeal request.

17811West ValleyChrisStelplugh4.334.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
17863SouthernPamSteube2.863.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

After multiple conversations with Pam about a fast track appeal as she qualifies.....
she said she was denied the first one at this rating.
I asked her to resubmit and she said it wouldn't let her.

Approve the appeal as it really qualifies for a fast track but technology glitches or operator error are making it impossible to submit the appropriate one.

17854SouthernGregStroud4.123.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Player states that his DUPR is 3.563 thereby justifying playing down. The DUPR rating is stale at 3/21
player started 2025 at 3.87 never dipping lower.
He steadily played himself up to 4.12

He won 47 games and lost 6. He allowed 19 appl points in the 47 wins and earned 5 appl points in the 6 losses.

He states his partner 'carried him' His partner Craig Wessman started at 4.02 and went to 4.27 and increase of .25 and he started at 3.87 and went to 4.01. He increased by .14. He helped his partner go up by .25 while he also increased by .14

seems to me he earned his new rating with all his hard work..... recommend denying the appeal.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17859East ValleyAJStroud3.623.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT APPEAL

Both AJ and her partner Jen Dale did well at 3.5
Just because her partner did not move up to 3.5 is not a reason to play 18+ @ 3.0.
I would suggest Jen do an appeal to 3.5 if they want to continue to play together. Jen's current rating is 3.42 and could easily get an appeal to 3.5.
These two would DOMINATE at 3.0.

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17891West ValleyDanaSullivan3.934.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19580SouthernAnabelTeuten3.433.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

I have played with and against her many times. She is definitely a 3.5 player and should be approved as such.

18568East ValleyMegTippin3.293.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

3.28 TO 3.5
Played 3.5 24/25 seasons
247pts won/346pts lost

Would dominate at 3.0
3.5 is where she needs to be
17947Casa GrandeBrendaTipton3.363.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
17951Casa GrandeBrendaTipton3.363.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
  • Duplicate Appeal
17826West ValleyJulieTisue3.804.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Should have been a Fast track. Julie played 4.0 last season.
I approved rather than asking her to resubmit — outcome is the same.
17822West ValleyLouiseTobias3.874.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason