Displaying 251 - 275 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
17848East ValleyTrishKossick2.543.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT 2.54 to 3.0
Started 3.2 as a new player with given INDEX and declined progressively to 2.54 from this original rating
Should be playing 2.5 or exception

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17851East ValleyDarlaLemieux4.033.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

NO REJECT

Darla "FORGOT" to. mention in comments that she ALSO played 2025 on a 4.0 team.
DOMINATED with EVERY partner she had @3.5

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17854SouthernGregStroud4.123.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Player states that his DUPR is 3.563 thereby justifying playing down. The DUPR rating is stale at 3/21
player started 2025 at 3.87 never dipping lower.
He steadily played himself up to 4.12

He won 47 games and lost 6. He allowed 19 appl points in the 47 wins and earned 5 appl points in the 6 losses.

He states his partner 'carried him' His partner Craig Wessman started at 4.02 and went to 4.27 and increase of .25 and he started at 3.87 and went to 4.01. He increased by .14. He helped his partner go up by .25 while he also increased by .14

seems to me he earned his new rating with all his hard work..... recommend denying the appeal.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17858West ValleyJanePulvermacher4.604.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17859East ValleyAJStroud3.623.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT APPEAL

Both AJ and her partner Jen Dale did well at 3.5
Just because her partner did not move up to 3.5 is not a reason to play 18+ @ 3.0.
I would suggest Jen do an appeal to 3.5 if they want to continue to play together. Jen's current rating is 3.42 and could easily get an appeal to 3.5.
These two would DOMINATE at 3.0.

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17866SouthernJeannieAntonucci2.53.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Jeannie had heart surgery. She was listed on a roster but never played a game. She has no other appl history. There is a jeannie Antonnuci in DUPR but no identifiers to know if it was her. Her PBB is 2.875

I told her she needed to do a self ratings assessment and turn it into her captain. They could then choose to add her or not. I said this appeal would be denied as there is no information to support the request.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17873East ValleyJuneGill3.653.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

NO REJECT

June won 80% of games in 2025
SPLIT 12% and only lost 7%

She will totally dominate with any partner she plays with and she did play with many different partners which also shows she is dominating at 3.0

June is 65, no apparant medical issues so I feel she should stay at 3.5 where she will be competitive.
She is not on a community based team as she states so should be able to find another team at 3.5

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17875West ValleyNancyMiller3.223.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17876West ValleyDeeGetz3.03.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17878SouthernDanaBlumberg3.33.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Dana started at 3.30 and ended at 3.30 after 32 games. she had 14 wins and 18 losses. She earned 10 appl points in the 18 losses and gave up 6 appl points in the 14 wins.

The highest she ever got was a 3.38. Never reached 3.5.
I don't think it warrants the 3.5 request.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17879West ValleyLindaTompkins4.174.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17880SouthernSuzanneRichards2.83.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

suzanne started at the given rate of 3.2 and ended at 2.8. Her rating progressed steadily downward.
Mixed play
6 wins 18 losses
appl points scored 5 appl points allowed 1
womens
5 wins 13 losses
appl points scored 7 appl points allowed
The suzanne richards that is 72 as our appl states does not have a pb brackets rating. Her dupr is 2.943 which comes only from a ladder league within her community and no tournament play

she states she has rotator cuff issues.
I don't recommend approval

  • Duplicate Appeal
17888West ValleyToriBenz-Hillstrom3.714.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17890East ValleyCandaceSharkey4.203.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Candace started 2025 season as a high 3.5 at 3.93
She stayed over 4.0 the entire season and won the majority of games in doubles and mixed.

I would suggest if she wants to play with her same partners they could possibly appeal to 4.0 as they are higher level 3.5 players as well.

Candace will be competitive at 4.0

Her reasoning to stay at 3.5 is to play with the same partners.

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
  • Medical reasoning does not support the Appeal
17891West ValleyDanaSullivan3.934.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17892West ValleySelenaHayes3.914.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17893East ValleyWilliamWayne4.554.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

NO REJECT

Wayne consistently went over 4.5 throughout the 2025 season. To make it over that 4.5 skill level takes good consistent playing esp with as many games as he played in two teams.

Wayne played with multiple partners and did well thru out the season on a 50+ and a 65+ team. Wayne will be competitive at 4.5.

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17909East ValleyRobinCastriano2.793.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT 2.79 TO 3.0
Robin started season at 3.20 AS A NEW PLAYER
She won 2:22lost
152 won: 263Lost
Stay at 2.5

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17912SouthernGREGSCHOENBERG3.654.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

comes from small Tubac team
he states tubac needs him for the sixth male on the 50+ 4,0 team

Last year ended 3.65
50+ mixed team 1 win 9 loses
gave up 2 appl points and won 3 appl points

65+ mixed team
20 wins 22 losses
gave up 15 appl points and earned 9 appl points
65+ mens team
18 wins and 12 losses
gave up 8 appl points and earned 5 appl points

This creates a hard dilemma for the Tubac team with limited players. Greg has a much better win loss record in 65+ than in 50 +

he definitely qualifies for the 65+ no exception limit.
He really should play as an exception on the 50+ team.

check to see the number of exceptions on 50+ already

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17920SouthernMary AnnGarman3.233.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

appeal is not warranted. Lost 13 games, won one.

HOWEVER she would qualify for the new 65+ rule if she actually plays on a 65+ team.

how should this be handled

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17923West ValleyDanielSeverino3.714.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17927West ValleyTerriSchaefers5.004.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17936West ValleyKarinSobotta5.555.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • Player is already at the desired Roster Rating
17942SouthernDahliaBowden3.253.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Dahlia at 3.0 with her rating being set at 3.2 as a new appl player.

She had 12 wins and 12 losses 5 appl pts earned and 3 allowed. Her ending rating was a 3.25

She is under 65 so no auto approval.

While she says her coach says she should play up, her appl numbers do not warrant an appeal up. There is no data to suggest she is ready for 3.5

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17944SouthernArdean Nickersonnickerson3.103.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

I asked her to resubmit as her info says she wants to play 3.5 but the data she put in says 3.10 appeal to 3.0,

rejected

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason