Displaying 276 - 300 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
18815West ValleyLarryWeiss3.914.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Played with 18+ mixed flights, scores counted
close to 4.0 both seasons played

Approved
18818East ValleyBradCurtis3.433.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

FAST TRACK
18822West ValleyCatherine (Cati)Ackley2.973.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

first year was 2025
w 24 losses 10
high point scores on losses to add to team totals
18829East ValleyLanaSerio3.363.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

WON 32 LOST 8
403 WON 197 LOST
10+PPG

Needs to be 3.5
will dominate at 3.0
18835West ValleyEricBendfelt3.954.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete
18839East ValleySharonBottock3.33.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

WON 12 Lost 24
239 WON 328 LOST
7ppg
PLAYED 3.5 for previous 3 years
Will still be competitive at 3.5
Middle ground
WILL donate at 3.0
18847West ValleyPaulOlson4.744.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Did not play in 2025
Self rating through Appeal process
18851East ValleyjohnBahlenhorst2.53.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

John should be SELF RATING at 3.5. He has not played APPL since '23 and missed the box to self rate in registering.
18874East ValleySeanBowers4.524.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

Started APPL in '25 as new player at 4.70

INDEX Consistently went down every game till end at 4.52 barely over
WON 3 LOST !5
WON 96 Lost 183
5.8 ppl

Sean should have been playing 4.0 last year. His capt rated him at 4.5 as a new player to allow room for others on his 4.5 team. He realized he should be playing 4.0 as the season transpired.
He needs to be on 4.0 and establish his rating this year at that level.
18879West ValleyJenniferWoodard3.413.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
18914SouthernJeanBustard3.834.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Jean played in a mixed division with 4.0 50+ and 4.0 18+ players. Our division was the only one where the 18+ were counted against us. All other divisions they were thrown out and not counted. Many of the 18+ players by the time she played against her had reached rating of 4.58, 4.6.

If you take the 18+ match off it raises her back up to a 3.89 she would have qualified for a fast track appeal.

She did not play in 2024 so there is no recent information outside this year to consider. Did not win a single game in the three matches. The other two matches were against the state champion 4.0 50+ women. We had a tough league.

I recommend she be allowed to play 4.0
18922West ValleyKariAnderson3.474.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

wins 9
losses 33
performance declined in 2025 in 4.0
probably best in 3.5

Decline and encouraged to submit an appeal to 3.5

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18923East ValleyMarcGrenier3.714.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE
221 W 281 lost
7.5 ppl

DUPR 4/117
Winning tournaments at 4.0

Needs to be at 4.0
Will dominate at 3.5
18928SouthernMadisonNash3.94.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Madi Nash is asking to appeal from 3.95 to 4.5. She is a special case and I spoke to Greg about her and he agrees with me that she should be allowed to play up.

Madi is 31 years old and an exceptional athlete. She was a star soccer player and softball player locally and picked the paddle up a little over one year ago. I played with her in the beginning teaching her rules and drilling with her regularly. I hooked her up with several teaching pros as she was progressing quite rapidly. I tried to get a 4.0 18+ team to take her last year as I saw the potential but she was an unknown entity.

Madi played throughout the season with her mother dominating the 3.5 competition. Their team won the league and qualified for state. Madi and Victoria chose not to go as Madi was involved in other tournament play at that time.

Madi played only three matches. 2 with her mother and 1 with a 3.2 player. After that her index rose from 3.7 to 3.95 in three matches. She chose to go off and play in match point tournaments after that.

Her DUPR is 3.99 but that came from two tournaments early in her year. After the tournaments she played in were not dupr rated.

see below for her rated tournaments played with 4.5-5.0 players

I believe she is the future of young Appl players and is a draw for others. I recommend the appeal be approved.
18957East ValleyAlansinger4.654.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

Self rate 4.0

Hasn't played since knee injury in '23
19017West ValleyJimSeaman3.954.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Close to and above 4.0 all season.
positive w/L recors
19020SouthernJillAnderson3.714.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Jill is a 3.71 wishing to play at 4.0. She started 2.25 at 3.87 and dropped each game. She played one match in January and one match in March. She won only 33 points in 12 games which averages less than 3 pts per game. She had 132 points scored against her.

She said she has done lots of drilling and work on the court this summer, which I think is good, however, there really is not enough data to warrant the 4.0 jump.

In 2024 she played 3 matches in mixed double 3.5. She was competitive. Her rating went from 3.7 to 3.87 which qualified her for a fast track appeal to 4.0 this past year.

I have no idea if she has a dupr. The only Jill Anderson I could find that was close in age had a rating of 3.52

I do not feel that her current rating shows that she is strong enough to play 4.0. I recommend another year at 3.5 and she can play on 4.0 as an exception if they have room.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19023East ValleyRobertLynne4.073.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE??

Robert called me and has a high blood pressure problem and is worried about playing at the higher level.
He would like to stay at 3.5.
He did win 61 lost 23 so 72%
810p won 576p lost
Averaged 9 mpg

He did well at 3.5, but could probably stay another year that level. I'm worried about the high blood pressure situation.
19036West ValleyZOECOPENHAVER2.993.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Good w/L record
19039West ValleyPamLeeming2.883.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Didn't play in 2025, only 6 games in 2024

Self rating via Appeal process
19049West ValleyKerriePalermo43.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Last played in 2022

Self rating via Appeal process
19059West ValleyBarbaraOlesen4.13.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Last played APPl in 2022
Medical issue since then

Self Rating via Appeal
19066West ValleyTamaraRamsey4.033.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Has not played since 2022

Fast track through appeals
19068SouthernNatalieCarey3.123.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Natalie would like to appeal her 3.12 rating to play 3.5

She played six matches last season. 2 at 3.5 and 4 at 3.0
She started 3.0 and ended at 3.12. In 2024 she started at 3.2 and went to 3.0. No history of her rating increasing.

In 3.0 she won 6 games and lost 12. She scored a total of 120 points while 166 were scored by her opponents.
In 3.5 she won 7 games and lost 5 with her total points bing 105 and the opponents being 106.

She started the 2024 season at 3.2 and ended at 3.0 and then inn 2025 she started at 3.0 and never got any higher than 3.12 with much of the season being lower than 3.0.

Her stats kind of give mixed signals but I feel like over a two year period her rating has been flat making me believe that she needs another year at 3.0.

I recommend denial

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19088West ValleyVickiRyan4.113.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Didn't play 2024 season

Self rating via appeal process
 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason