| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18794 | Southern | Ruth | Neufeld | 3.52 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Ruth is wanting to play 4.0 up from 3.52. At first glance you would think no way. However Her dupr is 3.88. She has 162 wins and 246 losses in her dupr rating. It is a solid rating. Her tournament play shows that she can hang at 4.0. I recommend we grant the appeal. | |
| 18095 | Southern | Scott | Burbank | 4.06 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Scott wants to appeal down from a 4.06 to a 3.5 which he played at last year. He is over 65 He played all 8 matches. He won 33 games and lost 19. that is a 78% win rate. he has no dupr | |
| 19478 | East Valley | Masako | Ford | 3.5 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Self rate 4.0 | |
| 19237 | Southern | Terri | Gilreath | 3.98 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | She started at 3.86 and was off and on over 4.0 throughout the season. final game of the final match started at 4.01 and dropped to 3.97 | |
| 19238 | Southern | Shelann | Lockwood | 3.89 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Shelann did not play in 2025. APPL index from 2024 is 3.89. She wants to play 4.0. She started at 4.0 in 2024 and dropped to a 3.89 but regularly plays with higher level players. I recommend the appeal be approved. | |
| 17952 | East Valley | Tricia | Montague | 3.96 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Should be Fast Track APPROVE | |
| 17826 | West Valley | Julie | Tisue | 3.80 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Should have been a Fast track. Julie played 4.0 last season. | |
| 17773 | West Valley | Hoo Yin | Wong | 3.82 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Should have submitted a Fast Track. I approved rather than asking them to resubmit — outcome is the same. | |
| 17780 | West Valley | Lisa | Deminsky | 2.77 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Should have submitted a Fast Track. I approved rather then asking them to resubmit - same outcome. | |
| 17958 | Southern | John | Pieri | 4.01 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | Started season at 4.01 in 3.5 division. Never dropped below 4.0. He was the only 4.0 in all the matches. State regular season bottom line is he wants to likely play on a 65+ team of 3.5. Final rating is 4.09 not 4.01 He seems to have dominated at 3.5 last year even 50/50 against the open age guys. While his rating didn't go up a ton 4.01 to 4.09 he played with players with much lower level ratings all year. DUPR is 3.6 put only one game |
|
| 18287 | Southern | Sue | Linton | 3.57 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Sue is a 3.57 player who is asking to play down to a 3.0. She is 75 years old and wants to play doubles with her husband who is a 3.0 and is 82 years old. She was quite sick this past spring and has had a hard time recovering. Sue and her husband played together last year in 30 games. They won 22 and lost 8. They gained 6 Appl points and allowed 12. Sue's rating bobbed around all year going between the 3.37 she started with and peaked for one game at 3.6 before going back to a 3.55. While she was over 3.5 most of the season it was usually 3.51, 3.55.... she only hit 3.6 at one time and only for one game of one match. While her husband COULD play up on a 3.5 team due to his age, his ratings are continuously low 3.2. with that being said, is she better than 3.0 yes, at 75 playing a a 65+ should that give her some grace when she plays with an 82 year old partner..... My feelings are if they are husband and wife and can even stand to play together on the same side.... they must be amazing people. I would vote yes based on age. But I realize I am pretty tenderhearted when it come to things like this. | |
| 17880 | Southern | Suzanne | Richards | 2.8 | 3.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | suzanne started at the given rate of 3.2 and ended at 2.8. Her rating progressed steadily downward. she states she has rotator cuff issues. |
|
| 18068 | West Valley | Monte | Williams | 4.46 | 4.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | System issue? started 4.0 at a 4.52 APPL Index Above 4.5 all season except last 2 games | |
| 17938 | Southern | James | A Strickland | 2.78 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | This one was a real pain. I had to look up every single person played as there is no indication within the rating if they were the 18+ team.....ugh As a 50+ player. He won 15 games, lost 23 Against the 18+ he won 2 games, lost 8 This player was born in 1961 In his losses he lost 1 game to players born in 1976 and 1979 3 of his games lost were to people less than 10 years younger than him. In the 18+ matches his rating dropped a total of .15. Added back into his final rating that brings him to a 2.93. Enough for an auto appeal. | |
| 17757 | Southern | Sandra | Hubbard | 3.33 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | This player has steadily declined since her start at 3.7 in 2024. She ended the mixed season in 2024 at 3.24. 2025 she played gender doubles and only raised her rating by .09. She played six matches all with the same partner. They won 14 games and lost 22. They scored 4 appl points in their 22 losses and allowed 8 appl points in their 14 wins. Her dupr rating is 3.239 and she has no history in pickleball brackets. I do not believe that the fact that she disagrees with her rating is sufficient to warrant and increased rating for appeal to 3.5 |
|
| 18072 | Southern | Tracey | Rathjen | 3.34 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Tracey has a dupr of 3.896 and is .01 off of an auto appeal. She won 10 games and lost 14 she accrued 8 appl points while allowing only 3. Tracey may have lost quite a few games but actually split 6 of those 14 losses. Only once did she actually go over 3.5 last season but I feel that her dupr and the close number to the auto appeal should allow the appeal to be approved | |
| 18292 | West Valley | Debbie | Andrews | 3.27 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | w 21 l27 |
|
| 19098 | West Valley | Sherry | Harleman | 3.58 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | w 3, l- 18 | |
| 18052 | West Valley | Lupe | Shepard | 3.81 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | W 7, L 17 in 2025 season DUPR presented has only 4 games and 1% reliability |
|
| 18299 | West Valley | Rodrigo | Perez-Zambrano | 3.6 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | w-7 Lost 11 |
|
| 18922 | West Valley | Kari | Anderson | 3.47 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | wins 9 Decline and encouraged to submit an appeal to 3.5 |
|
| 18126 | West Valley | Miki | Dammarell | 2.96 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Won 73% Approve | |
| 17855 | East Valley | Annie | Kloss | 3.92 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | YES APPROVE 3.92 to 4.0 COULD have done FAST TRACK STate Champs @3.5 | |
| 17861 | East Valley | Karen | Turnlund | 3.92 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | YES APPROVE 3.92 to 4.0 | |
| 17895 | East Valley | Dianne | Birgenheir | 2.87 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | YES APPROVE Dianne played 2.5/3.0 division in 2025 Won some, lost some and split some She should be consistent at 3.0 and competitive. | |
| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
