Displaying 301 - 306 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
18731SouthernDavidScaglione4.614.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

David has a rating of 4.61 and was asking to appeal down to continue to play with his. same team at 4.0. His main reason was his work schedule. He also stated that he would like to be hooked. up with a 4.5 team if denied.

Since Appl policy is to deny playing down except in very specific conditions (usually medical) I referred him to Scot Ritchie who is the 4.5 coordinator here in Tucson.

Recommend denial due to Appl policy.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18773East ValleyDaveLeach3.143.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT

started at 3.7 ended 3.1
won 4 lost 32
155 won
376 lost
ave 4ppg

Can't justify 3.5 index

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18801West ValleyCherylNitahara4.745.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • Player is already at the desired Roster Rating
18922West ValleyKariAnderson3.474.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

wins 9
losses 33
performance declined in 2025 in 4.0
probably best in 3.5

Decline and encouraged to submit an appeal to 3.5

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19020SouthernJillAnderson3.714.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Jill is a 3.71 wishing to play at 4.0. She started 2.25 at 3.87 and dropped each game. She played one match in January and one match in March. She won only 33 points in 12 games which averages less than 3 pts per game. She had 132 points scored against her.

She said she has done lots of drilling and work on the court this summer, which I think is good, however, there really is not enough data to warrant the 4.0 jump.

In 2024 she played 3 matches in mixed double 3.5. She was competitive. Her rating went from 3.7 to 3.87 which qualified her for a fast track appeal to 4.0 this past year.

I have no idea if she has a dupr. The only Jill Anderson I could find that was close in age had a rating of 3.52

I do not feel that her current rating shows that she is strong enough to play 4.0. I recommend another year at 3.5 and she can play on 4.0 as an exception if they have room.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19068SouthernNatalieCarey3.123.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Natalie would like to appeal her 3.12 rating to play 3.5

She played six matches last season. 2 at 3.5 and 4 at 3.0
She started 3.0 and ended at 3.12. In 2024 she started at 3.2 and went to 3.0. No history of her rating increasing.

In 3.0 she won 6 games and lost 12. She scored a total of 120 points while 166 were scored by her opponents.
In 3.5 she won 7 games and lost 5 with her total points bing 105 and the opponents being 106.

She started the 2024 season at 3.2 and ended at 3.0 and then inn 2025 she started at 3.0 and never got any higher than 3.12 with much of the season being lower than 3.0.

Her stats kind of give mixed signals but I feel like over a two year period her rating has been flat making me believe that she needs another year at 3.0.

I recommend denial

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason