Roster Rating Standard Appeal

suzanne started at the given rate of 3.2 and ended at 2.8. Her rating progressed steadily downward.
Mixed play
6 wins 18 losses
appl points scored 5 appl points allowed 1
womens
5 wins 13 losses
appl points scored 7 appl points allowed
The suzanne richards that is 72 as our appl states does not have a pb brackets rating. Her dupr is 2.943 which comes only from a ladder league within her community and no tournament play

she states she has rotator cuff issues.
I don't recommend approval

• Duplicate Appeal

YES APPROVE

Dianne played 2.5/3.0 division in 2025

Won some, lost some and split some

She should be consistent at 3.0 and competitive.

This one was a real pain. I had to look up every single person played as there is no indication within the rating if they were the 18+ team.....ugh

As a 50+ player. He won 15 games, lost 23
Earned 12 appl points and allowed 6.

Against the 18+ he won 2 games, lost 8
Earned 3 appl points and allowed 2

This player was born in 1961 In his losses he lost 1 game to players born in 1976 and 1979
2 games to players born in 1993 and 1966
and 2 games to players born in 1970 and 1969
He lost one game to players born in 1990 and 2000

3 of his games lost were to people less than 10 years younger than him.

In the 18+ matches his rating dropped a total of .15. Added back into his final rating that brings him to a 2.93. Enough for an auto appeal.

eligible for Fast track

YES APPROVE

ONLY .06 FROM 3.0

PLAYED SCOTTSDALE LEAGUE IN 2025
3.2 RATING IN THIS LEAGUE
PLAYED ON 3.0 TEAM IN 2024

LC states that her team was in a weak division and finished toward the bottom.

Only went over 3.5 in last 2 games

Approve

Robert played 34 games last yea He lost 24 mens doubles matches, won 3. He lost 4 mixed double and won 3. He earned 6 appl points in mens doubles and allowed 2. He won 3 apple points in mixed and allowed two.

He struggled all year with leg issues eventually having surgery to correct it. He states that subs scores might have been attributed to him but I would have know way of knowing if this was accurate.

He played in 65+ last year and can do so again this year if he so chooses. In adding up all matches both doubles and mixed his average rating is a 2.9. I believe that he should be granted the appeal based on that, due to the unknown of whose scores are actually entered and no way to find out. If he chooses to play 65+ he is able to regardless.

Duper is 3.006

Actual APPL Index is 2.97
Played 3.0 last season - qualifies for FAST Track

• APPL history of results does not support the Appeal

Karen is .01 off of what would be an auto appeal. Two years ago she was injured in a bicycle crash in August 2023 that broke her spine, her pelvis and her arm. It was months before she was out of the hospital and at home again. She did not play last year until May 2025 when she was finally released to do so.

Karen has been down at ACE every single day taking lessons, working on the ball machine and playing with 3.0 and 3.5 players.

Her tenacity warrants a 3.0 rating if nothing else. She was literally shattered into many pieces.

Won 73%
Dominated 2.5

Approve

Dominated division
good w/l percentage 70%
and low points allowed by opponents
APPROVE