Roster Rating Standard Appeal

• Duplicate Appeal

APPROVE
Did NOT play 2025
Has not played since 2024 and broke ankle
Has several medical conditions and would be better starting back at 3.5 and see how it goes

In 2025 Suzanne played both mixed and gender doubles.

Gender:
5 wins and 15 losses. Earned 5 appl points in 15 losses
allowed 4 appl points in 5 wins

Mixed:
6 wins and 16 losses Earned 6 appl points in 16 losses and allowed 4 appl points in 6 wins

Dupr is 2.943 She said she played injured last year. Player is 72 years old.

The only thing that makes me want to honor the appeal is the injury and the dupr rating. Her wins and loses do not support it but at 72 she is still playing so maybe she earns it by determination.

Registered but never played APPL

Sue is a 3.57 player who is asking to play down to a 3.0. She is 75 years old and wants to play doubles with her husband who is a 3.0 and is 82 years old. She was quite sick this past spring and has had a hard time recovering.

Sue and her husband played together last year in 30 games. They won 22 and lost 8. They gained 6 Appl points and allowed 12.

Sue's rating bobbed around all year going between the 3.37 she started with and peaked for one game at 3.6 before going back to a 3.55. While she was over 3.5 most of the season it was usually 3.51, 3.55.... she only hit 3.6 at one time and only for one game of one match.

While her husband COULD play up on a 3.5 team due to his age, his ratings are continuously low 3.2.

with that being said, is she better than 3.0 yes, at 75 playing a a 65+ should that give her some grace when she plays with an 82 year old partner.....

My feelings are if they are husband and wife and can even stand to play together on the same side.... they must be amazing people. I would vote yes based on age. But I realize I am pretty tenderhearted when it come to things like this.

• APPL history of results does not support the Appeal

APPROVE
Her index is 2.72 and originally appealed as her team was thinking about playing 3.0. She was basically the guinea pig to see if they could get appeals....Then the team decided to stay at 2.5 "after" she had appealed.

w 3, l- 18
had surgery
2025 first year, probably should have started at 3.0

• APPL history of results does not support the Appeal

• APPL history of results does not support the Appeal

APPROVE

WON 12 Lost 24
239 WON 328 LOST
7ppg
PLAYED 3.5 for previous 3 years
Will still be competitive at 3.5
Middle ground
WILL donate at 3.0

APPROVE

Started APPL in '25 as new player at 4.70

INDEX Consistently went down every game till end at 4.52 barely over
WON 3 LOST !5
WON 96 Lost 183
5.8 ppl

Sean should have been playing 4.0 last year. His capt rated him at 4.5 as a new player to allow room for others on his 4.5 team. He realized he should be playing 4.0 as the season transpired.
He needs to be on 4.0 and establish his rating this year at that level.