Displaying 26 - 50 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
17880SouthernSuzanneRichards2.83.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

suzanne started at the given rate of 3.2 and ended at 2.8. Her rating progressed steadily downward.
Mixed play
6 wins 18 losses
appl points scored 5 appl points allowed 1
womens
5 wins 13 losses
appl points scored 7 appl points allowed
The suzanne richards that is 72 as our appl states does not have a pb brackets rating. Her dupr is 2.943 which comes only from a ladder league within her community and no tournament play

she states she has rotator cuff issues.
I don't recommend approval

  • Duplicate Appeal
17771West ValleyKelliJohnson3.003.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18731SouthernDavidScaglione4.614.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

David has a rating of 4.61 and was asking to appeal down to continue to play with his. same team at 4.0. His main reason was his work schedule. He also stated that he would like to be hooked. up with a 4.5 team if denied.

Since Appl policy is to deny playing down except in very specific conditions (usually medical) I referred him to Scot Ritchie who is the 4.5 coordinator here in Tucson.

Recommend denial due to Appl policy.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18240West ValleyMingFu4.323.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
18052West ValleyLupeShepard3.814.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

W 7, L 17 in 2025 season
APPL Index declined last 2 seasons

DUPR presented has only 4 games and 1% reliability

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19162SouthernNicoleMiller3.363.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Nicole has a 3.36 rating and wants to appeal to 4.0. She won 8. matches and lost 14 at 3.5 this past season. She and her partner scored 168 points and the opponents scored 244.

She states her DUPR is 4.078 from the most recent tournament last week. She played 3.0 not 3.5 while her dupr going in was a 3.567. The opponents were an average of 2.98 players. Her rating was artificially inflated by playing down in a league she was over qualified to play in.

Her reading in APPL began this year at 3.52 and dropped match over match to 3.36.

I feel like the DUPR is not accurate due to sandbagging in 3.0 and the Appl reflects that she did not hold her own in the 3.5 league.

I don't recommend the approval as the stats do not warrant it.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17757SouthernSandraHubbard3.333.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

This player has steadily declined since her start at 3.7 in 2024. She ended the mixed season in 2024 at 3.24. 2025 she played gender doubles and only raised her rating by .09. She played six matches all with the same partner. They won 14 games and lost 22. They scored 4 appl points in their 22 losses and allowed 8 appl points in their 14 wins. Her dupr rating is 3.239 and she has no history in pickleball brackets. I do not believe that the fact that she disagrees with her rating is sufficient to warrant and increased rating for appeal to 3.5

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17878SouthernDanaBlumberg3.33.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Dana started at 3.30 and ended at 3.30 after 32 games. she had 14 wins and 18 losses. She earned 10 appl points in the 18 losses and gave up 6 appl points in the 14 wins.

The highest she ever got was a 3.38. Never reached 3.5.
I don't think it warrants the 3.5 request.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17892West ValleySelenaHayes3.914.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19681West ValleyLISAM MATTSON3.354.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17847West ValleyJohnAnket3.544.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

2025 W 5, loss 20
DUPR info on at 28% reliability
Index declined from 3.61-3.54 in 2025

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18244West ValleyTerriMims2.683.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17983West ValleyDebNielsen4.534.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

dominated 4.0

started season in 4.0 at an APPL Index of 4.5

Reject

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17770West ValleyVictoriaConstable3.383.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17772East ValleyGaryLaValley4.754.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT APPEAL from 4.75 to 4.0

Gary played 4.5 level and 4.5/5.0 level OPEN in 2025

I have NO IDEA why Gary would want to go back to 4.0

History DOES NOT SUPPORT THIS APPEAL

Steve agrees with this decision

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18098East Valleyangelsinger3.834.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT
Plays at PICKLR at 4.0
2025 season played 4.0
145W 243L
4W 20L
6PPG

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17893East ValleyWilliamWayne4.554.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

NO REJECT

Wayne consistently went over 4.5 throughout the 2025 season. To make it over that 4.5 skill level takes good consistent playing esp with as many games as he played in two teams.

Wayne played with multiple partners and did well thru out the season on a 50+ and a 65+ team. Wayne will be competitive at 4.5.

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17846East ValleyKentGierke4.023.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT APPEAL

Plays consistent at 4.0
Doesn't dominate, mostly wins and splits

Has beat good 4.0 players I'm familiar with

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17837East ValleyLynRube3.614.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT 3.61 TO 4.0.
65+ TEAM
Lyn is 65 and can play on 4.0 team
Lynn's performance in '25 declined to her significant drop below 4.0

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18049SouthernErichBower4.544.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Played in multi-level teams this year. 4.0/4.5 18, 50, 65 mixed
50, 65 mens
In mixed he won 21 games and lost 16. He scored 16 appl points in those 16 losses and allowed 11 in the 21 wins.
in mens he won 13 and lost 11 scoring 7 appl points in the 11 losses and allowing 7 appl points in the 13 wins.

he basically pretty much split everything on both teams. He did better within the mixed, he played regularly with his wife.

In his mixed matches he jumped .09 in the first three games. then he dropped down .01 in next two and back up 1.12 in the third one.

in mens he dropped .01, then went back up 1.01 and then down. .01 and then back up 1.12.

While he says he 'didn't win anything' in tournaments he regularly took silver and one bronze. That means he made it to the medal rounds. This was in 4.0. these were in 21-23

His dupr is currently 4.475 and stale since 2023. At one time his dupr got as high as 4.771 in 23.

He may not have competed in the last couple of years but he played 61 games last year which definitely gives a picture of what he is capable of even though he says 60 is not enough to give him an index.

He will end up playing in the same league next year as he did this year with combined 4.0 and 4.5. I think he will do well and should be a 4.5

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17784West ValleyBurtGeiger4.554.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17891West ValleyDanaSullivan3.934.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18245West ValleyTerriMims2.683.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • Duplicate Appeal
17859East ValleyAJStroud3.623.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT APPEAL

Both AJ and her partner Jen Dale did well at 3.5
Just because her partner did not move up to 3.5 is not a reason to play 18+ @ 3.0.
I would suggest Jen do an appeal to 3.5 if they want to continue to play together. Jen's current rating is 3.42 and could easily get an appeal to 3.5.
These two would DOMINATE at 3.0.

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19680West ValleyLISAM MATTSON3.354.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Data does not support moving up.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason