Displaying 26 - 50 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
17805West ValleyThomasEllison3.353.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17808West ValleyAngelaEdmonson3.424.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Rejected
Added a note to player to resubmit to 3.5
Current request it too large

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17812West ValleySteveWest3.03.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17816West ValleyJAKELUCERO3.273.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17817East ValleyBruceHancock4.003.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT approval from 4.0 to 3.5

Dominated at 3.5 throughout 2025
All partners were lower level 3.5 players than Bruce and that is why they didn't go up as much as Bruce in INDEX

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17819West ValleyPamelaSmith3.734.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17821West ValleyLoriMoore3.363.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17822West ValleyLouiseTobias3.874.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17836East ValleyLynRube2.614.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • Duplicate Appeal
17837East ValleyLynRube3.614.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT 3.61 TO 4.0.
65+ TEAM
Lyn is 65 and can play on 4.0 team
Lynn's performance in '25 declined to her significant drop below 4.0

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17841SouthernCurtisSimpson4.534.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Curtis Simpson is one of the players that caused a great deal of complaints last year regarding sandbagging. He played as a captain rated player on a 3.5 tear. He won 95 games and lost 7. At state he won 16 games and lost 3. Regular season saw him score 7 appl points in 7 losses and state had 4 appl points scored in 8 losses. Regular season saw 33 appl points scored against him in 95 wins and 5 appl points in 16 wins at state.

His dupr is 3.956. HOWEVER he plays round robin mixers at an indoor club weekly with rotating partners for that dupr score. His dupr has never been over 4.0. Pb brackets is all blurred out and I cannot see it. I do not recommend approval of the appeal

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17846East ValleyKentGierke4.023.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT APPEAL

Plays consistent at 4.0
Doesn't dominate, mostly wins and splits

Has beat good 4.0 players I'm familiar with

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17847West ValleyJohnAnket3.544.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

2025 W 5, loss 20
DUPR info on at 28% reliability
Index declined from 3.61-3.54 in 2025

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17848East ValleyTrishKossick2.543.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT 2.54 to 3.0
Started 3.2 as a new player with given INDEX and declined progressively to 2.54 from this original rating
Should be playing 2.5 or exception

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17851East ValleyDarlaLemieux4.033.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

NO REJECT

Darla "FORGOT" to. mention in comments that she ALSO played 2025 on a 4.0 team.
DOMINATED with EVERY partner she had @3.5

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17854SouthernGregStroud4.123.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Player states that his DUPR is 3.563 thereby justifying playing down. The DUPR rating is stale at 3/21
player started 2025 at 3.87 never dipping lower.
He steadily played himself up to 4.12

He won 47 games and lost 6. He allowed 19 appl points in the 47 wins and earned 5 appl points in the 6 losses.

He states his partner 'carried him' His partner Craig Wessman started at 4.02 and went to 4.27 and increase of .25 and he started at 3.87 and went to 4.01. He increased by .14. He helped his partner go up by .25 while he also increased by .14

seems to me he earned his new rating with all his hard work..... recommend denying the appeal.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17858West ValleyJanePulvermacher4.604.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17859East ValleyAJStroud3.623.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT APPEAL

Both AJ and her partner Jen Dale did well at 3.5
Just because her partner did not move up to 3.5 is not a reason to play 18+ @ 3.0.
I would suggest Jen do an appeal to 3.5 if they want to continue to play together. Jen's current rating is 3.42 and could easily get an appeal to 3.5.
These two would DOMINATE at 3.0.

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17866SouthernJeannieAntonucci2.53.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Jeannie had heart surgery. She was listed on a roster but never played a game. She has no other appl history. There is a jeannie Antonnuci in DUPR but no identifiers to know if it was her. Her PBB is 2.875

I told her she needed to do a self ratings assessment and turn it into her captain. They could then choose to add her or not. I said this appeal would be denied as there is no information to support the request.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17873East ValleyJuneGill3.653.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

NO REJECT

June won 80% of games in 2025
SPLIT 12% and only lost 7%

She will totally dominate with any partner she plays with and she did play with many different partners which also shows she is dominating at 3.0

June is 65, no apparant medical issues so I feel she should stay at 3.5 where she will be competitive.
She is not on a community based team as she states so should be able to find another team at 3.5

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17875West ValleyNancyMiller3.223.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17876West ValleyDeeGetz3.03.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17878SouthernDanaBlumberg3.33.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Dana started at 3.30 and ended at 3.30 after 32 games. she had 14 wins and 18 losses. She earned 10 appl points in the 18 losses and gave up 6 appl points in the 14 wins.

The highest she ever got was a 3.38. Never reached 3.5.
I don't think it warrants the 3.5 request.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17879West ValleyLindaTompkins4.174.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17880SouthernSuzanneRichards2.83.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

suzanne started at the given rate of 3.2 and ended at 2.8. Her rating progressed steadily downward.
Mixed play
6 wins 18 losses
appl points scored 5 appl points allowed 1
womens
5 wins 13 losses
appl points scored 7 appl points allowed
The suzanne richards that is 72 as our appl states does not have a pb brackets rating. Her dupr is 2.943 which comes only from a ladder league within her community and no tournament play

she states she has rotator cuff issues.
I don't recommend approval

  • Duplicate Appeal
 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason