| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18095 | Southern | Scott | Burbank | 4.06 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Scott wants to appeal down from a 4.06 to a 3.5 which he played at last year. He is over 65 He played all 8 matches. He won 33 games and lost 19. that is a 78% win rate. he has no dupr | |
| 19354 | West Valley | Scott | Moyer | 3.86 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 17757 | Southern | Sandra | Hubbard | 3.33 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | This player has steadily declined since her start at 3.7 in 2024. She ended the mixed season in 2024 at 3.24. 2025 she played gender doubles and only raised her rating by .09. She played six matches all with the same partner. They won 14 games and lost 22. They scored 4 appl points in their 22 losses and allowed 8 appl points in their 14 wins. Her dupr rating is 3.239 and she has no history in pickleball brackets. I do not believe that the fact that she disagrees with her rating is sufficient to warrant and increased rating for appeal to 3.5 |
|
| 18794 | Southern | Ruth | Neufeld | 3.52 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Ruth is wanting to play 4.0 up from 3.52. At first glance you would think no way. However Her dupr is 3.88. She has 162 wins and 246 losses in her dupr rating. It is a solid rating. Her tournament play shows that she can hang at 4.0. I recommend we grant the appeal. | |
| 18763 | East Valley | RUSSELL | KNIGHT | 3.39 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE Played 3.5 in 25 | |
| 18128 | Southern | Ron | Jacobsen | 4.53 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Ron played in a 50/65 40 45 mixed league. He plays out of Tubac which has no 4.5 team. Due to the barely over, last match, no place to play in Tubac I ask for approval. Dupr is 4.42. Last match was one year ago. | |
| 18299 | West Valley | Rodrigo | Perez-Zambrano | 3.6 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | w-7 Lost 11 |
|
| 17909 | East Valley | Robin | Castriano | 2.79 | 3.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | REJECT 2.79 TO 3.0 |
|
| 17921 | West Valley | Robert | Niedzwiecki | 3.78 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Didn't play in 2025. | |
| 17977 | West Valley | Robert | Marshall | 3.90 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | 3-11 at State | |
| 18007 | Southern | Robert | Salter | 2.83 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Robert played 34 games last yea He lost 24 mens doubles matches, won 3. He lost 4 mixed double and won 3. He earned 6 appl points in mens doubles and allowed 2. He won 3 apple points in mixed and allowed two. He struggled all year with leg issues eventually having surgery to correct it. He states that subs scores might have been attributed to him but I would have know way of knowing if this was accurate. He played in 65+ last year and can do so again this year if he so chooses. In adding up all matches both doubles and mixed his average rating is a 2.9. I believe that he should be granted the appeal based on that, due to the unknown of whose scores are actually entered and no way to find out. If he chooses to play 65+ he is able to regardless. Duper is 3.006 | |
| 19023 | East Valley | Robert | Lynne | 4.07 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE?? Robert called me and has a high blood pressure problem and is worried about playing at the higher level. He did well at 3.5, but could probably stay another year that level. I'm worried about the high blood pressure situation. | |
| 17759 | Southern | Renee | Craddock | 3.75 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | I am very familiar with this player. I was a sub on her team last year and played with her in two matches. We had never been on the court together before these matches. We did will winning approximately 50% of the games and getting the APPL point in the majority of the games. The team went on to win State. Renee played only four matches all year, two with me and two with a 4.18 player. Their results were similar to mine. At state only one of the matches was reported. Renee played with yet two new partners at state. Renee is a very strong player coming from a high level tennis background. She had her knee replaced two years ago so was unable to play that season. She came back this year very strong. She is one of the players that people like to play with as she understands strategy and is thoughtful about how her shot affect her partner. She drills with me and plays multiple times pers week in round robin play with 4.0 to 4.5 players. Her rating has steadily increased over the years and given the right partnership this year on our team, she will likely raise her rating to over 4.0. I believer her play style and play lever warrant the rating of 4.0 | |
| 19333 | West Valley | Rafael | Juarbe | 3.30 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 19299 | West Valley | Phyllis | Hubatch | 3.68 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 19210 | Southern | Philip | A Isaac | 3.5 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Have Nancy do this appeal 2025 was first season Philip played APPL. Was rated 3.5 (captain's rating); started as 3.70, dropped .20 and ended as 3.5. Played one match (6 games), lost all games, earned only 2 APPL points and was pickled twice. Player believes he more accurately should have started as 3.0 and would like to play on a 65+ 3.0 team in 2026 | |
| 18028 | West Valley | Perri | Guido | 2.95 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 17925 | West Valley | Peg | Barcelo | 4.23 | 4.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | RD and LC review and approval. Merger flights in pilot group counted and impacted rating. | |
| 18161 | East Valley | Paul | Malley | 3.50 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE Paul has played MXD with his wife as his partner for 3 years. She actually applied for an appeal from 4.07 to 4.0 which we denied. We told her that her partner could apply for an appeal up and would have a better chance for approval. Averages almost 9 PPG | |
| 18847 | West Valley | Paul | Olson | 4.74 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Did not play in 2025 | |
| 19316 | West Valley | Patty | Meyer | 4.66 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 18296 | West Valley | Patrick | Hansen | 4.43 | 4.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | did not play in 2025 DUPR recent, and above 4.5 Self rate through appeal | |
| 17959 | Southern | Pat | Hawkins | 4.08 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | He played only one game in 2025. Not even one match. Wants to appeal to 3.5 Both hips replaced with complications afterwards. He will be 64 in 2026 and have to play on a 50+ team. Rating is 4.08 in 2023 he played in 65+ and 55+ age groups. Played with same partner most of the matches. Their ratings were into the 4.0's and other opponents were in 3.75-3.8 on average. He started 2024 at 4.22 in a 3.5 league....I have no idea how that happens. His rating went as high as 4.32. It dropped toward the end of the season to 4.0-4.1 range while in 3.5 league. For the past two years he has played on a 3.5 team with a higher than 4.0 rating...... while he will be the oldest in that age group he also has shown that he can play at 4.0. Does the injury and complication give him the gift of being overrated for a third year in a row???? Last time his rating was below 4.0 2/23 | |
| 17819 | West Valley | Pamela | Smith | 3.73 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 17814 | Southern | Pam | Holmes | 2.89 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Did not play in 2025 due to injury 2024 14 wins 15 losses earned 8 appl points, allowed 5 would have qualified for a fast track appeal. Recommend approval. | |
| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
