Roster Rating Standard Appeal

• APPL history of results does not support the Appeal

W 7, L 17 in 2025 season
APPL Index declined last 2 seasons

DUPR presented has only 4 games and 1% reliability

• APPL history of results does not support the Appeal

Candace started 2025 season as a high 3.5 at 3.93
She stayed over 4.0 the entire season and won the majority of games in doubles and mixed.

I would suggest if she wants to play with her same partners they could possibly appeal to 4.0 as they are higher level 3.5 players as well.

Candace will be competitive at 4.0

Her reasoning to stay at 3.5 is to play with the same partners.

• Information provided does not support the Appeal
• APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
• Medical reasoning does not support the Appeal

YES APPROVE APPEAL Greg M agrees

75 yr old playing 65+ wants to go TO 2.5 from 3.1.
DID NOT dominate @2.5
LOST majority of games @ 2.5 and split a few @ 2.5
12 :12
Femme is where she need to be

Gene is petitioning based on medical reasons. Bone on Bone knee in both knees.
He played in only two matches last year both in early January before deciding the combined higher skill and younger age bracket was too much for him.

He won four games lost 8. He earned four appl points and allowed three.

Gene started playing in 2022 with an Appl rating as high as 4.38 at one point. His appl rating never dipped below the 4.0. He is petitioning to play 3.5. He can play on a 65 team but only at 4.0 Gene's dupr is stale at 3.5 in 2021

Close to and above 4.0 all season.
positive w/L recors

APPROVE 3.82 TO 4.0

Played 4.0 last year in Casa Grande 2025
East valley Roster 4.0
Wants to play WD East valley this year at 4.0

History and Tournament play and DUPR and UTPR support 4.0 play

comes from small Tubac team
he states tubac needs him for the sixth male on the 50+ 4,0 team

Last year ended 3.65
50+ mixed team 1 win 9 loses
gave up 2 appl points and won 3 appl points

65+ mixed team
20 wins 22 losses
gave up 15 appl points and earned 9 appl points
65+ mens team
18 wins and 12 losses
gave up 8 appl points and earned 5 appl points

This creates a hard dilemma for the Tubac team with limited players. Greg has a much better win loss record in 65+ than in 50 +

he definitely qualifies for the 65+ no exception limit.
He really should play as an exception on the 50+ team.

check to see the number of exceptions on 50+ already

• APPL history of results does not support the Appeal

Registered but never played APPL

David has a rating of 4.61 and was asking to appeal down to continue to play with his. same team at 4.0. His main reason was his work schedule. He also stated that he would like to be hooked. up with a 4.5 team if denied.

Since Appl policy is to deny playing down except in very specific conditions (usually medical) I referred him to Scot Ritchie who is the 4.5 coordinator here in Tucson.

Recommend denial due to Appl policy.

• APPL history of results does not support the Appeal

Robert played 34 games last yea He lost 24 mens doubles matches, won 3. He lost 4 mixed double and won 3. He earned 6 appl points in mens doubles and allowed 2. He won 3 apple points in mixed and allowed two.

He struggled all year with leg issues eventually having surgery to correct it. He states that subs scores might have been attributed to him but I would have know way of knowing if this was accurate.

He played in 65+ last year and can do so again this year if he so chooses. In adding up all matches both doubles and mixed his average rating is a 2.9. I believe that he should be granted the appeal based on that, due to the unknown of whose scores are actually entered and no way to find out. If he chooses to play 65+ he is able to regardless.

Duper is 3.006

• Duplicate Appeal

• Duplicate Appeal