Displaying 51 - 75 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
17824West ValleyAndrewTobias3.984.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete
17825East ValleyClarenceLindblom3.794.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE appeal to 4.0 from 3.79
STARTED AT 4.2 Played 4 seasons at 4.0
Won 50% of games 15/15. 252:261
Competitive at 4.0
He stayed just barely under 4.0 most of the season
17826West ValleyJulieTisue3.804.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Should have been a Fast track. Julie played 4.0 last season.
I approved rather than asking her to resubmit — outcome is the same.
17832West ValleyShawnaDierken3.453.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
17836East ValleyLynRube2.614.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • Duplicate Appeal
17837East ValleyLynRube3.614.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT 3.61 TO 4.0.
65+ TEAM
Lyn is 65 and can play on 4.0 team
Lynn's performance in '25 declined to her significant drop below 4.0

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17839Casa GrandeJanettKline3.834.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete
17840East ValleyMaryWaitrovich3.844.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE 3.84 to 4.0
.01 from fast track
started season at 4.2
Considered fast track entire season except for the very last match
APPL history supports competitive at 4.0
UTPR and DUPR 4.0+
191:336
17841SouthernCurtisSimpson4.534.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Curtis Simpson is one of the players that caused a great deal of complaints last year regarding sandbagging. He played as a captain rated player on a 3.5 tear. He won 95 games and lost 7. At state he won 16 games and lost 3. Regular season saw him score 7 appl points in 7 losses and state had 4 appl points scored in 8 losses. Regular season saw 33 appl points scored against him in 95 wins and 5 appl points in 16 wins at state.

His dupr is 3.956. HOWEVER he plays round robin mixers at an indoor club weekly with rotating partners for that dupr score. His dupr has never been over 4.0. Pb brackets is all blurred out and I cannot see it. I do not recommend approval of the appeal

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17844East ValleyMeganMacpherson4.153.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

REJECT APPEAL

Did play in a division including 3.0 teams, but it was to my understanding that those games did not count toward APPL index. MOST teams in division were 3.5 teams and Megan won over 80% of games

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17845SouthernGeorgePatterson4.003.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

George is over 70 and wants to play in the newly formed 70+ 3.5 league. He lives at Saddlebrooke ranch. They do not allow outside players on their teams. He would make the 6th player. Unsure if it will be quad format or regular.

His rating since 2022 has been in the high 3.5's. He got bumped up over 4.01 on a three game forfeit from another team. His highest rating was a 4.05. He has no valid dupr and his pb brackets is all blurred out so I can't access it. His dupr rating of 4.42 is from 2022 with only one game, not match recorded last year and the year before. They were both appl games and neither one of them was validated by the other party.

2025 he won 14 games, lost 10 He scored 8 appl points in 10 losses and had 5 appl points scored against him in 14 wins. His record was generally split games.

George sees a podiatrist for chronic foot pain for the past three years.

Due to the 4.01 rating, wanting to play the over 70's team....recommend the approval.

17846East ValleyKentGierke4.023.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT APPEAL

Plays consistent at 4.0
Doesn't dominate, mostly wins and splits

Has beat good 4.0 players I'm familiar with

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17847West ValleyJohnAnket3.544.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

2025 W 5, loss 20
DUPR info on at 28% reliability
Index declined from 3.61-3.54 in 2025

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17848East ValleyTrishKossick2.543.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT 2.54 to 3.0
Started 3.2 as a new player with given INDEX and declined progressively to 2.54 from this original rating
Should be playing 2.5 or exception

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17850East ValleyFemmeSessions3.12.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE APPEAL Greg M agrees

75 yr old playing 65+ wants to go TO 2.5 from 3.1.
DID NOT dominate @2.5
LOST majority of games @ 2.5 and split a few @ 2.5
12 :12
Femme is where she need to be
17851East ValleyDarlaLemieux4.033.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

NO REJECT

Darla "FORGOT" to. mention in comments that she ALSO played 2025 on a 4.0 team.
DOMINATED with EVERY partner she had @3.5

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17853East ValleyKathyReam3.834.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE 3.83 to 4.0. Greg M agrees

Played 4.0 teams for 2 years
and Tournaments 80% medaled
Went from 4.20 to 3.83
Competitive @ 4.0
.02 from FAST TRACK AND ONLY because of her LASt game
17854SouthernGregStroud4.123.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Player states that his DUPR is 3.563 thereby justifying playing down. The DUPR rating is stale at 3/21
player started 2025 at 3.87 never dipping lower.
He steadily played himself up to 4.12

He won 47 games and lost 6. He allowed 19 appl points in the 47 wins and earned 5 appl points in the 6 losses.

He states his partner 'carried him' His partner Craig Wessman started at 4.02 and went to 4.27 and increase of .25 and he started at 3.87 and went to 4.01. He increased by .14. He helped his partner go up by .25 while he also increased by .14

seems to me he earned his new rating with all his hard work..... recommend denying the appeal.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17855East ValleyAnnieKloss3.924.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE

3.92 to 4.0

COULD have done FAST TRACK

STate Champs @3.5
Played all matches at state
17858West ValleyJanePulvermacher4.604.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17859East ValleyAJStroud3.623.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT APPEAL

Both AJ and her partner Jen Dale did well at 3.5
Just because her partner did not move up to 3.5 is not a reason to play 18+ @ 3.0.
I would suggest Jen do an appeal to 3.5 if they want to continue to play together. Jen's current rating is 3.42 and could easily get an appeal to 3.5.
These two would DOMINATE at 3.0.

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17861East ValleyKarenTurnlund3.924.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE

3.92 to 4.0
Could have done a FAST TRACK
17863SouthernPamSteube2.863.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

After multiple conversations with Pam about a fast track appeal as she qualifies.....
she said she was denied the first one at this rating.
I asked her to resubmit and she said it wouldn't let her.

Approve the appeal as it really qualifies for a fast track but technology glitches or operator error are making it impossible to submit the appropriate one.

17864East ValleyJeffreyJacobs3.353.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE Greg M Agrees

Played Casa Grande with a 3.87 Current rating
Played '23 East valley 3.5
Played MXD and Doubles 3.5 in 2025
60 W 36 L 62%wins 886:732
DUPR 3.695
17866SouthernJeannieAntonucci2.53.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Jeannie had heart surgery. She was listed on a roster but never played a game. She has no other appl history. There is a jeannie Antonnuci in DUPR but no identifiers to know if it was her. Her PBB is 2.875

I told her she needed to do a self ratings assessment and turn it into her captain. They could then choose to add her or not. I said this appeal would be denied as there is no information to support the request.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason