Displaying 51 - 75 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
18723West ValleyNatalieBoles2.262.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
19738West Valleycindyribble3.483.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Fast Track
17757SouthernSandraHubbard3.333.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

This player has steadily declined since her start at 3.7 in 2024. She ended the mixed season in 2024 at 3.24. 2025 she played gender doubles and only raised her rating by .09. She played six matches all with the same partner. They won 14 games and lost 22. They scored 4 appl points in their 22 losses and allowed 8 appl points in their 14 wins. Her dupr rating is 3.239 and she has no history in pickleball brackets. I do not believe that the fact that she disagrees with her rating is sufficient to warrant and increased rating for appeal to 3.5

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17756West ValleyKathleen (Kathy)Hubert-Wyss4.013.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
19236SouthernKathyPalese3.504.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Kathy has not played since 2023 in APPL. She has a current dupr of 4.275. SHE STARTED AT 3.95 and ended at 3.81 in 2023 in 4.0

Instead of having her do a self assessment I would say approve the appeal based on the current dupr.
17920SouthernMary AnnGarman3.233.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

appeal is not warranted. Lost 13 games, won one.

HOWEVER she would qualify for the new 65+ rule if she actually plays on a 65+ team.

how should this be handled

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17960East ValleyDonnaVarnell2.973.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete
  • Duplicate Appeal
17793East ValleyKathyHartung4.03.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT 4.0 to 3.5

History shows Kathy playing 15 games in APPL in 2025

Kathy dominated at 3.5 and needs to stay at 4.0 this season

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17810East ValleyCindySchutt3.834.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE 3.83 to 4.0
.02 fast track

34 W 32 L
561:579
Competitive at 4.0
17808West ValleyAngelaEdmonson3.424.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Rejected
Added a note to player to resubmit to 3.5
Current request it too large

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19098West ValleySherryHarleman3.583.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

w 3, l- 18
had surgery
2025 first year, probably should have started at 3.0
18172East ValleyKrisGrsnsttom4.534.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT
Played a lot of games last year on 2 teams
Men's and Mxd at 4.0
Climbed consistently all season
I see he "split" games with Bill Wayne who we have also denied appeal to 4.0 from 4.5
W 786 L599
Averages almost 10 ppg
54W 30LKris is strong and needs to play at 4.5 or he will totally dominate this year at 4.0

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17949Casa GrandeBarbraFrizzell3.283.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18098East Valleyangelsinger3.834.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT
Plays at PICKLR at 4.0
2025 season played 4.0
145W 243L
4W 20L
6PPG

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18316East ValleyLynnJones3.53.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT

Index 3.59
Won 43 Lost 11
80% Win
554won 282lost
9.88 ppg average

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19478East ValleyMasakoFord3.54.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Self rate 4.0
Has but played since 2022
17794SouthernNancyCuzman2.823.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Nancy has been a solid 3.0 player for several years. As a coach/captain, Nancy ends up playing with the players no one else wants to play with. Nancy has a good well rounded game. She dinks, can do overheads and thinks about strategy. Nancy is very slightly built and I believe her lack of strength is the only thing that keeps her from being a 3.5 player. I would approve Nancy's appeal as she has done the work to be a 3.0 but constantly puts others first. Her average rating this past year is 2.917 which is well within the auto appeal boundaries.
18095SouthernScottBurbank4.063.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Scott wants to appeal down from a 4.06 to a 3.5 which he played at last year. He is over 65
If the teams hold up the same as they did last year his only option will be to play 50/65+ 4.0/4.5

He played all 8 matches. He won 33 games and lost 19. that is a 78% win rate.
He accrued 9 appl points in the 19 losses and allowed 7 in the 33 wins.
This is a tough one. He dominated last year. He is not far over 4.0 and yet he will be a huge disadvantage if he moves up.....He went over 4.0 in his last match.

he has no dupr
18818East ValleyBradCurtis3.433.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

FAST TRACK
18125West ValleyTrynnaJohnson2.783.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17950Casa GrandeTracieMcBeth3.353.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
  • Duplicate Appeal
18072SouthernTraceyRathjen3.343.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Tracey has a dupr of 3.896 and is .01 off of an auto appeal. She won 10 games and lost 14 she accrued 8 appl points while allowing only 3.

Tracey may have lost quite a few games but actually split 6 of those 14 losses. Only once did she actually go over 3.5 last season but I feel that her dupr and the close number to the auto appeal should allow the appeal to be approved
18568East ValleyMegTippin3.293.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

3.28 TO 3.5
Played 3.5 24/25 seasons
247pts won/346pts lost

Would dominate at 3.0
3.5 is where she needs to be
19493East ValleyKarenLindgren3.003.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Approve
Hasn’t played since 2023
Self rate at 3.5
17785SouthernMichaelTreiberg3.474.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

he won 15 games and lost 3 last year with a different partner each match. his dupr is 4.016. I have seen him play at ACE and he is definitely a 4.0

He plays as a mixed doubles partner with a 4.5 player that I know well.

Recommend approval even though it is up two levels. He was obviously miss assigned.
Recommend approval

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason