Displaying 51 - 75 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
17950Casa GrandeTracieMcBeth3.353.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
  • Duplicate Appeal
18049SouthernErichBower4.544.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Played in multi-level teams this year. 4.0/4.5 18, 50, 65 mixed
50, 65 mens
In mixed he won 21 games and lost 16. He scored 16 appl points in those 16 losses and allowed 11 in the 21 wins.
in mens he won 13 and lost 11 scoring 7 appl points in the 11 losses and allowing 7 appl points in the 13 wins.

he basically pretty much split everything on both teams. He did better within the mixed, he played regularly with his wife.

In his mixed matches he jumped .09 in the first three games. then he dropped down .01 in next two and back up 1.12 in the third one.

in mens he dropped .01, then went back up 1.01 and then down. .01 and then back up 1.12.

While he says he 'didn't win anything' in tournaments he regularly took silver and one bronze. That means he made it to the medal rounds. This was in 4.0. these were in 21-23

His dupr is currently 4.475 and stale since 2023. At one time his dupr got as high as 4.771 in 23.

He may not have competed in the last couple of years but he played 61 games last year which definitely gives a picture of what he is capable of even though he says 60 is not enough to give him an index.

He will end up playing in the same league next year as he did this year with combined 4.0 and 4.5. I think he will do well and should be a 4.5

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18240West ValleyMingFu4.323.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
19023East ValleyRobertLynne4.073.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE??

Robert called me and has a high blood pressure problem and is worried about playing at the higher level.
He would like to stay at 3.5.
He did win 61 lost 23 so 72%
810p won 576p lost
Averaged 9 mpg

He did well at 3.5, but could probably stay another year that level. I'm worried about the high blood pressure situation.
17757SouthernSandraHubbard3.333.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

This player has steadily declined since her start at 3.7 in 2024. She ended the mixed season in 2024 at 3.24. 2025 she played gender doubles and only raised her rating by .09. She played six matches all with the same partner. They won 14 games and lost 22. They scored 4 appl points in their 22 losses and allowed 8 appl points in their 14 wins. Her dupr rating is 3.239 and she has no history in pickleball brackets. I do not believe that the fact that she disagrees with her rating is sufficient to warrant and increased rating for appeal to 3.5

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17756West ValleyKathleen (Kathy)Hubert-Wyss4.013.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
19141East ValleyTeresaCler4.083.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE
Did NOT play 2025
Has not played since 2024 and broke ankle
Has several medical conditions and would be better starting back at 3.5 and see how it goes
17920SouthernMary AnnGarman3.233.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

appeal is not warranted. Lost 13 games, won one.

HOWEVER she would qualify for the new 65+ rule if she actually plays on a 65+ team.

how should this be handled

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18879West ValleyJenniferWoodard3.413.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
19098West ValleySherryHarleman3.583.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

w 3, l- 18
had surgery
2025 first year, probably should have started at 3.0
17810East ValleyCindySchutt3.834.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE 3.83 to 4.0
.02 fast track

34 W 32 L
561:579
Competitive at 4.0
17808West ValleyAngelaEdmonson3.424.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Rejected
Added a note to player to resubmit to 3.5
Current request it too large

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18287SouthernSueLinton3.573.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Sue is a 3.57 player who is asking to play down to a 3.0. She is 75 years old and wants to play doubles with her husband who is a 3.0 and is 82 years old. She was quite sick this past spring and has had a hard time recovering.

Sue and her husband played together last year in 30 games. They won 22 and lost 8. They gained 6 Appl points and allowed 12.

Sue's rating bobbed around all year going between the 3.37 she started with and peaked for one game at 3.6 before going back to a 3.55. While she was over 3.5 most of the season it was usually 3.51, 3.55.... she only hit 3.6 at one time and only for one game of one match.

While her husband COULD play up on a 3.5 team due to his age, his ratings are continuously low 3.2.

with that being said, is she better than 3.0 yes, at 75 playing a a 65+ should that give her some grace when she plays with an 82 year old partner.....

My feelings are if they are husband and wife and can even stand to play together on the same side.... they must be amazing people. I would vote yes based on age. But I realize I am pretty tenderhearted when it come to things like this.

18095SouthernScottBurbank4.063.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Scott wants to appeal down from a 4.06 to a 3.5 which he played at last year. He is over 65
If the teams hold up the same as they did last year his only option will be to play 50/65+ 4.0/4.5

He played all 8 matches. He won 33 games and lost 19. that is a 78% win rate.
He accrued 9 appl points in the 19 losses and allowed 7 in the 33 wins.
This is a tough one. He dominated last year. He is not far over 4.0 and yet he will be a huge disadvantage if he moves up.....He went over 4.0 in his last match.

he has no dupr
19335East ValleyTomWilp33.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE
SELF RATE 3.5
19233West ValleyLisaMarshall3.834.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Last played APPL in 2024

Self rating via Appeal process
18170Casa GrandeJenniferRoberts3.003.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
18244West ValleyTerriMims2.683.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17794SouthernNancyCuzman2.823.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Nancy has been a solid 3.0 player for several years. As a coach/captain, Nancy ends up playing with the players no one else wants to play with. Nancy has a good well rounded game. She dinks, can do overheads and thinks about strategy. Nancy is very slightly built and I believe her lack of strength is the only thing that keeps her from being a 3.5 player. I would approve Nancy's appeal as she has done the work to be a 3.0 but constantly puts others first. Her average rating this past year is 2.917 which is well within the auto appeal boundaries.
17793East ValleyKathyHartung4.03.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT 4.0 to 3.5

History shows Kathy playing 15 games in APPL in 2025

Kathy dominated at 3.5 and needs to stay at 4.0 this season

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18098East Valleyangelsinger3.834.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT
Plays at PICKLR at 4.0
2025 season played 4.0
145W 243L
4W 20L
6PPG

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17960East ValleyDonnaVarnell2.973.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete
  • Duplicate Appeal
18568East ValleyMegTippin3.293.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

3.28 TO 3.5
Played 3.5 24/25 seasons
247pts won/346pts lost

Would dominate at 3.0
3.5 is where she needs to be
18292West ValleyDebbieAndrews3.274.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

w 21 l27

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18172East ValleyKrisGrsnsttom4.534.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT
Played a lot of games last year on 2 teams
Men's and Mxd at 4.0
Climbed consistently all season
I see he "split" games with Bill Wayne who we have also denied appeal to 4.0 from 4.5
W 786 L599
Averages almost 10 ppg
54W 30LKris is strong and needs to play at 4.5 or he will totally dominate this year at 4.0

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason