Displaying 76 - 100 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
17777East ValleyMargaretBarroll3.223.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE to 3.5 (RATING DESCREPANCH0
Greg M approves
220 pts : 257 points- W12:L 20 Split 12
1. Partner Rae Lynn Roe says started season at 5.28 and Margaret 3.25
2. Because Margaret WON and SPLIT several games, her rating COULD not go down so much. Because of the miscalculation approve to 3.5
**LOOK at ratings for Rae Lynn for 23-25 Started season at .19
17875West ValleyNancyMiller3.223.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17920SouthernMary AnnGarman3.233.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

appeal is not warranted. Lost 13 games, won one.

HOWEVER she would qualify for the new 65+ rule if she actually plays on a 65+ team.

how should this be handled

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18076SouthernAumiLeber3.243.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Aumi played both 3.5 and 3.0

3.5
She won 10 games and lost 2
She was paired with some of the teams strongest players.
She allowed 8 appl points while winning 2

3.0
She won 7 games and lost 5. She gained one appl point and allowed 3.

It appears she might be a good partner but not yet good enough to carry a weaker partner.

She went to a level up camp this summer and has attended multiple clinics through Cheryl Horvath this summer. Cheryl is a 4.5 player and a certified instructor.

Cheryl states she is 100% 3.5 ready for this season.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18729SouthernAudreyCampbell3.243.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Audrey is requesting an appeal from 3.24 to 3.5. She feels that the Appl index does not adequately show her skills.
In 2025 she played 3.5 winning 8 games and losing 10. her index started at 3.23 and ended at 2.34
In 2024 she played 3.5 and started at 3.27 and went down to 3.23
playing 3.0 in 2023 she started at the assigned 3.2 level and increased to 3.27 as a 3.0.

I just don't see that there is any marked improvement over a three year span that warrants such a high rating jump. I recommend she be denied,

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17942SouthernDahliaBowden3.253.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Dahlia at 3.0 with her rating being set at 3.2 as a new appl player.

She had 12 wins and 12 losses 5 appl pts earned and 3 allowed. Her ending rating was a 3.25

She is under 65 so no auto approval.

While she says her coach says she should play up, her appl numbers do not warrant an appeal up. There is no data to suggest she is ready for 3.5

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18208West ValleyMichelleVrolyks3.254.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Did not play in the 2025 season.

Self rate allowed

Approved to 4.0
17816West ValleyJAKELUCERO3.273.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18292West ValleyDebbieAndrews3.274.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

w 21 l27

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19342West ValleyDebbieAndrews3.274.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19391West ValleyDebbieAndrews3.273.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
17949Casa GrandeBarbraFrizzell3.283.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18568East ValleyMegTippin3.293.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

3.28 TO 3.5
Played 3.5 24/25 seasons
247pts won/346pts lost

Would dominate at 3.0
3.5 is where she needs to be
17878SouthernDanaBlumberg3.33.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Dana started at 3.30 and ended at 3.30 after 32 games. she had 14 wins and 18 losses. She earned 10 appl points in the 18 losses and gave up 6 appl points in the 14 wins.

The highest she ever got was a 3.38. Never reached 3.5.
I don't think it warrants the 3.5 request.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18839East ValleySharonBottock3.33.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

WON 12 Lost 24
239 WON 328 LOST
7ppg
PLAYED 3.5 for previous 3 years
Will still be competitive at 3.5
Middle ground
WILL donate at 3.0
19333West ValleyRafaelJuarbe3.303.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
19498East ValleyCassieValentine3.33.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Approve
Last played in 2023
Self rate 3.5
17869East ValleyAmyRounds3.313.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE to 3.5

Won all her games in 2024 @3.5 18+ and split ONE
Dominated at 3.0
Young player, strong and moving up

No games in 2025
17757SouthernSandraHubbard3.333.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

This player has steadily declined since her start at 3.7 in 2024. She ended the mixed season in 2024 at 3.24. 2025 she played gender doubles and only raised her rating by .09. She played six matches all with the same partner. They won 14 games and lost 22. They scored 4 appl points in their 22 losses and allowed 8 appl points in their 14 wins. Her dupr rating is 3.239 and she has no history in pickleball brackets. I do not believe that the fact that she disagrees with her rating is sufficient to warrant and increased rating for appeal to 3.5

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17795East ValleyTerriElletson3.333.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE 3.34 TO 3.35 (RATING DISCREPANCY)
Miss score at end of season at last game
Input shows 117-8
Barely under 3.5 most of the season (3.4)
Competitive at 3.5
W 14 L 20 Split 7
272 :432
18285SouthernEmmyMarshall3.333.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Emmy played on the 18+ La Paloma 3.0 team. This was a very limited league with only three teams in it. Emmy won 13 matches and lost 5. She gained three Appl points and allowed 6.

Emmy has been working on her game all summer with the pros at La Paloma. She also plays at ACE to see different competition.

She wants to improve her game by playing stronger players. She is .05 away from an auto appeal rating, however she did not play 3.5 last year.

I would recommend approval of the appeal to allow this player to continue to improve.

18672East ValleyBarbieAustin3.333.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

24 / 25 played 3.5

259 won
394 lost

Is competitive at 3.5 and where she needs to be
Will dominate at 3.0
17818West ValleyJoanneHuckle3.343.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
17968SouthernKimHehe3.343.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Kim's rating is .01 off a fast track appeal. Wants to appeal to 3.5

Over the past couple of years of play her rating has kind of danced all around the 3.2, 3.3 range. Never over a 3.5

When she played mixed her losses were 17 compared to 7 wins, 4 appl points earned and 8 allowed. That is a 41% win ratio in mixed.

In gender doubles she was 50/50. She had five wins and five losses. She earned 4 appl points and allowed to.

She speaks of two really dominant mixed teams and when I look at them I do see players that play 4.0 regularly in tournaments etc. That might account for the 41% ratio.

She played in 50+ in both of those even though she qualified for 65+. I don't know if it is because Tubac only has 'x' number of teams available.

I have reached out to Naomi Giles from Green Valley to see if she has an opinion on, or knows her play. No response

She is qualified to play on a 65+ team if one is available in Tubac. Limited teams available there. I would be inclined keep her playing and say yes.

She has 14 DUPR matches in 2024. 3.668
18072SouthernTraceyRathjen3.343.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Tracey has a dupr of 3.896 and is .01 off of an auto appeal. She won 10 games and lost 14 she accrued 8 appl points while allowing only 3.

Tracey may have lost quite a few games but actually split 6 of those 14 losses. Only once did she actually go over 3.5 last season but I feel that her dupr and the close number to the auto appeal should allow the appeal to be approved
 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason