Displaying 76 - 100 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
18723West ValleyNatalieBoles2.262.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
17869East ValleyAmyRounds3.313.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE to 3.5

Won all her games in 2024 @3.5 18+ and split ONE
Dominated at 3.0
Young player, strong and moving up

No games in 2025

17870SouthernElizabethYuengling3.413.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

recommended she do a fast track appeal.

19342West ValleyDebbieAndrews3.274.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19023East ValleyRobertLynne4.073.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE??

Robert called me and has a high blood pressure problem and is worried about playing at the higher level.
He would like to stay at 3.5.
He did win 61 lost 23 so 72%
810p won 576p lost
Averaged 9 mpg

He did well at 3.5, but could probably stay another year that level. I'm worried about the high blood pressure situation.

18128SouthernRonJacobsen4.534.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Ron played in a 50/65 40 45 mixed league.
His rating went to 4.53 at last game from a 4.5 even. The highest he got all year was 4.55 mid season.

He plays out of Tubac which has no 4.5 team.
He won 19 games and lost 5.
He allowed 10 points and actually split 8 games. He earned 4 points.

Due to the barely over, last match, no place to play in Tubac I ask for approval.

Dupr is 4.42. Last match was one year ago.

18095SouthernScottBurbank4.063.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Scott wants to appeal down from a 4.06 to a 3.5 which he played at last year. He is over 65
If the teams hold up the same as they did last year his only option will be to play 50/65+ 4.0/4.5

He played all 8 matches. He won 33 games and lost 19. that is a 78% win rate.
He accrued 9 appl points in the 19 losses and allowed 7 in the 33 wins.
This is a tough one. He dominated last year. He is not far over 4.0 and yet he will be a huge disadvantage if he moves up.....He went over 4.0 in his last match.

he has no dupr

17951Casa GrandeBrendaTipton3.363.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
  • Duplicate Appeal
19299West ValleyPhyllisHubatch3.683.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete
17878SouthernDanaBlumberg3.33.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Dana started at 3.30 and ended at 3.30 after 32 games. she had 14 wins and 18 losses. She earned 10 appl points in the 18 losses and gave up 6 appl points in the 14 wins.

The highest she ever got was a 3.38. Never reached 3.5.
I don't think it warrants the 3.5 request.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17879West ValleyLindaTompkins4.174.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19335East ValleyTomWilp33.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE
SELF RATE 3.5

18730SouthernEdwardWatson3.613.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Edward has no recent Appl history and should enter as a self-rated player. He has been notified of. this.

18126West ValleyMikiDammarell2.963.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Won 73%
Dominated 2.5

Approve

18316East ValleyLynnJones3.53.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT

Index 3.59
Won 43 Lost 11
80% Win
554won 282lost
9.88 ppg average

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17950Casa GrandeTracieMcBeth3.353.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
  • Duplicate Appeal
17921West ValleyRobertNiedzwiecki3.784.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Didn't play in 2025.
Self rating now.

17890East ValleyCandaceSharkey4.203.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Candace started 2025 season as a high 3.5 at 3.93
She stayed over 4.0 the entire season and won the majority of games in doubles and mixed.

I would suggest if she wants to play with her same partners they could possibly appeal to 4.0 as they are higher level 3.5 players as well.

Candace will be competitive at 4.0

Her reasoning to stay at 3.5 is to play with the same partners.

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
  • Medical reasoning does not support the Appeal
17891West ValleyDanaSullivan3.934.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19313West ValleyDoreneGreene23.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
18729SouthernAudreyCampbell3.243.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Audrey is requesting an appeal from 3.24 to 3.5. She feels that the Appl index does not adequately show her skills.
In 2025 she played 3.5 winning 8 games and losing 10. her index started at 3.23 and ended at 2.34
In 2024 she played 3.5 and started at 3.27 and went down to 3.23
playing 3.0 in 2023 she started at the assigned 3.2 level and increased to 3.27 as a 3.0.

I just don't see that there is any marked improvement over a three year span that warrants such a high rating jump. I recommend she be denied,

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18125West ValleyTrynnaJohnson2.783.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19233West ValleyLisaMarshall3.834.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Last played APPL in 2024

Self rating via Appeal process

17949Casa GrandeBarbraFrizzell3.283.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17920SouthernMary AnnGarman3.233.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

appeal is not warranted. Lost 13 games, won one.

HOWEVER she would qualify for the new 65+ rule if she actually plays on a 65+ team.

how should this be handled

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason