Displaying 76 - 100 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
19442East ValleyDougOsborn4.163.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE
SELF RATE 3.5

Played last in 2022

Back fusion and knee replacement
DUPR 3.248

18132East ValleyDouglasJohnston3.453.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE 3.45 TO 3.5
DUPR 3.6
DID NOT PLAY APPL 2025
PLAYED ON 3.5 IN '23
PLAYED IN ALBUQUERQUE other seasons
PLAYS AT MESA REGAL IN THEIR 3.5 GROUP

18168East ValleyEarlAmkin3.613.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE
Medical Appeal
Earl's INDEX has consistently gone down since '22 /'23
playing first in the East Valley. Earl moved to Casa Grande region in 24 and 25 for less competition because of his back issues. His Index continued to decline even in Casa Grande. Early ended the 25 season with a 3.33 rating. Earl feels he needs to be able to play safely in East Valley at 3.0.
His last rating in East Valley from 2023 was 3.61 which does not reflect his recent play.

19317SouthernEdBlohm3.453.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Ed is requesting to appeal from 3.45 to 3.5

Ed began the season at a 3.19 and continued to improve throughout the season ending up at 3.45. He played mixed and a merged division with open age players as his opponents. He was generally one of the higher rated players on the court often playing with 2.8 and less players and still winning enough for his index to steadily increase.

I feel that he is on a good trajectory and that his game continues to improve. He will do well to play in a harder division to see how he fairs.

I recommend approval of his appeal

18730SouthernEdwardWatson3.613.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Edward has no recent Appl history and should enter as a self-rated player. He has been notified of. this.

19184East ValleyEileenKoestner4.874.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

Has NOT played APPL since 2022
and this season cut short because of Knee issues

Basically SELF RATE at 4.0

17870SouthernElizabethYuengling3.413.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

recommended she do a fast track appeal.

18074West ValleyElizabeth (LIz)Kozloski33.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Played one match (six games) in 2023 -- that is her only play in APPL.

She was unsure what level she was playing. Had knee issues, and has since had total knee replacement.

Approved -- self rate due to very low game record and sitting out 2 seasons.

18285SouthernEmmyMarshall3.333.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Emmy played on the 18+ La Paloma 3.0 team. This was a very limited league with only three teams in it. Emmy won 13 matches and lost 5. She gained three Appl points and allowed 6.

Emmy has been working on her game all summer with the pros at La Paloma. She also plays at ACE to see different competition.

She wants to improve her game by playing stronger players. She is .05 away from an auto appeal rating, however she did not play 3.5 last year.

I would recommend approval of the appeal to allow this player to continue to improve.

18835West ValleyEricBendfelt3.954.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete
18049SouthernErichBower4.544.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Played in multi-level teams this year. 4.0/4.5 18, 50, 65 mixed
50, 65 mens
In mixed he won 21 games and lost 16. He scored 16 appl points in those 16 losses and allowed 11 in the 21 wins.
in mens he won 13 and lost 11 scoring 7 appl points in the 11 losses and allowing 7 appl points in the 13 wins.

he basically pretty much split everything on both teams. He did better within the mixed, he played regularly with his wife.

In his mixed matches he jumped .09 in the first three games. then he dropped down .01 in next two and back up 1.12 in the third one.

in mens he dropped .01, then went back up 1.01 and then down. .01 and then back up 1.12.

While he says he 'didn't win anything' in tournaments he regularly took silver and one bronze. That means he made it to the medal rounds. This was in 4.0. these were in 21-23

His dupr is currently 4.475 and stale since 2023. At one time his dupr got as high as 4.771 in 23.

He may not have competed in the last couple of years but he played 61 games last year which definitely gives a picture of what he is capable of even though he says 60 is not enough to give him an index.

He will end up playing in the same league next year as he did this year with combined 4.0 and 4.5. I think he will do well and should be a 4.5

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17850East ValleyFemmeSessions3.12.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE APPEAL Greg M agrees

75 yr old playing 65+ wants to go TO 2.5 from 3.1.
DID NOT dominate @2.5
LOST majority of games @ 2.5 and split a few @ 2.5
12 :12
Femme is where she need to be

19271SouthernFranBade3.914.0PendingRoster Rating Appeal Approve/Reject

I cannot find Fran Bade in the team section of admin at all. She shows up under members as a 4.0 self-rated player. She says she played last year.... there is no record of her ever playing. 11/2 I sent her an email letting her know I need more information from. her like a team name as she does not show up.

17772East ValleyGaryLaValley4.754.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT APPEAL from 4.75 to 4.0

Gary played 4.5 level and 4.5/5.0 level OPEN in 2025

I have NO IDEA why Gary would want to go back to 4.0

History DOES NOT SUPPORT THIS APPEAL

Steve agrees with this decision

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17813West ValleyGeneCudworth3.453.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
18065SouthernGeneSeifers4.223.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Gene is petitioning based on medical reasons. Bone on Bone knee in both knees.
He played in only two matches last year both in early January before deciding the combined higher skill and younger age bracket was too much for him.

He won four games lost 8. He earned four appl points and allowed three.

Gene started playing in 2022 with an Appl rating as high as 4.38 at one point. His appl rating never dipped below the 4.0. He is petitioning to play 3.5. He can play on a 65 team but only at 4.0 Gene's dupr is stale at 3.5 in 2021

17845SouthernGeorgePatterson4.003.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

George is over 70 and wants to play in the newly formed 70+ 3.5 league. He lives at Saddlebrooke ranch. They do not allow outside players on their teams. He would make the 6th player. Unsure if it will be quad format or regular.

His rating since 2022 has been in the high 3.5's. He got bumped up over 4.01 on a three game forfeit from another team. His highest rating was a 4.05. He has no valid dupr and his pb brackets is all blurred out so I can't access it. His dupr rating of 4.42 is from 2022 with only one game, not match recorded last year and the year before. They were both appl games and neither one of them was validated by the other party.

2025 he won 14 games, lost 10 He scored 8 appl points in 10 losses and had 5 appl points scored against him in 14 wins. His record was generally split games.

George sees a podiatrist for chronic foot pain for the past three years.

Due to the 4.01 rating, wanting to play the over 70's team....recommend the approval.

18047SouthernGeorgePatterson4.03.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

George played 9 matches last year. He won 17 games and lost 10. He had 8 appl points earned and 6 allowed.

He played on a 65+ team and states he will be 72 this year. Three of the wins come due to a forfeit.

He states he has neuropathy in his feet and arthritis. His index is 4.01. He wants to play 3.5 again due to the increasing pain levels. He has disabled plates on his car he states.

It appears Saddlebrook adds their APPL matches into Dupr. His dupr is 4.42 HOWEVER there are only two appl matches in it that are fairly current and one has not been validated. The other ratings come from 2022.

Since he will be playing in the 65+ league I recommend we approve the rating of 3.5 as he is only 4.01 and the highest he got last year was 4.05. Neuropathy makes it very hard to play so I don't feel he has any advantage.

18272SouthernGeorgiaBeletsos3.934.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Georgia is a 3.93 wanting to appeal to 4.0. She started at the 3.7 for a new Appl player last year. During the regular season she played mix play. She won 20 games and lost 10. During those she gained 6 Appl points and gave away 10. Many of her matches were split win/loss.

It appears she 'can hang' with the 3.5 players and would like to play up for next year.

I recommend she be allowed to play up as she improved from a 3.7 to a 3.93 over the year.

17990East ValleyGeriLuciani2.753.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE to 3.0
HOVERING AT 3.99 2025
Last 4 games 2.93 to
2.79 just the last 4 games
263 won 246 lost
50% win/loss

17930West ValleyGillianHunn4.754.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

only played one match last year, it was her first season. Captain rated. Basically allowing her to self rate this season through the appeals process. Her rating should correct quickly competing at 4.0.

19298East ValleyGloriaGilbert3.483.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

3.48 to 3.5

32 wins 4 losses
State Tournament
384win
168lost
10.7ppg

17749West ValleyGordonCowher3.563.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17971West ValleyGordy Cowher SGPCCowher3.53.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Played in merged flights two years.

17854SouthernGregStroud4.123.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Player states that his DUPR is 3.563 thereby justifying playing down. The DUPR rating is stale at 3/21
player started 2025 at 3.87 never dipping lower.
He steadily played himself up to 4.12

He won 47 games and lost 6. He allowed 19 appl points in the 47 wins and earned 5 appl points in the 6 losses.

He states his partner 'carried him' His partner Craig Wessman started at 4.02 and went to 4.27 and increase of .25 and he started at 3.87 and went to 4.01. He increased by .14. He helped his partner go up by .25 while he also increased by .14

seems to me he earned his new rating with all his hard work..... recommend denying the appeal.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason