| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17814 | Southern | Pam | Holmes | 2.89 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Did not play in 2025 due to injury 2024 14 wins 15 losses earned 8 appl points, allowed 5 would have qualified for a fast track appeal. Recommend approval. | |
| 17863 | Southern | Pam | Steube | 2.86 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | After multiple conversations with Pam about a fast track appeal as she qualifies..... Approve the appeal as it really qualifies for a fast track but technology glitches or operator error are making it impossible to submit the appropriate one. | |
| 18249 | West Valley | Olivia | Nichols | 3.50 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Did not play in 2025 Self rating | |
| 18218 | East Valley | Olivia | Nichols | 3.94 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 3.94 to 4.0 | |
| 17867 | West Valley | nony | Riglesberger | 3.46 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 19162 | Southern | Nicole | Miller | 3.36 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | Nicole has a 3.36 rating and wants to appeal to 4.0. She won 8. matches and lost 14 at 3.5 this past season. She and her partner scored 168 points and the opponents scored 244. She states her DUPR is 4.078 from the most recent tournament last week. She played 3.0 not 3.5 while her dupr going in was a 3.567. The opponents were an average of 2.98 players. Her rating was artificially inflated by playing down in a league she was over qualified to play in. Her reading in APPL began this year at 3.52 and dropped match over match to 3.36. I feel like the DUPR is not accurate due to sandbagging in 3.0 and the Appl reflects that she did not hold her own in the 3.5 league. I don't recommend the approval as the stats do not warrant it. |
|
| 19068 | Southern | Natalie | Carey | 3.12 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | Natalie would like to appeal her 3.12 rating to play 3.5 She played six matches last season. 2 at 3.5 and 4 at 3.0 In 3.0 she won 6 games and lost 12. She scored a total of 120 points while 166 were scored by her opponents. She started the 2024 season at 3.2 and ended at 3.0 and then inn 2025 she started at 3.0 and never got any higher than 3.12 with much of the season being lower than 3.0. Her stats kind of give mixed signals but I feel like over a two year period her rating has been flat making me believe that she needs another year at 3.0. I recommend denial |
|
| 18723 | West Valley | Natalie | Boles | 2.26 | 2.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 18722 | West Valley | Natalie | Boles | 2.26 | 2.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 18753 | West Valley | Natalie | Boles | 2.26 | 2.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 17794 | Southern | Nancy | Cuzman | 2.82 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Nancy has been a solid 3.0 player for several years. As a coach/captain, Nancy ends up playing with the players no one else wants to play with. Nancy has a good well rounded game. She dinks, can do overheads and thinks about strategy. Nancy is very slightly built and I believe her lack of strength is the only thing that keeps her from being a 3.5 player. I would approve Nancy's appeal as she has done the work to be a 3.0 but constantly puts others first. Her average rating this past year is 2.917 which is well within the auto appeal boundaries. | |
| 17875 | West Valley | Nancy | Miller | 3.22 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 18068 | West Valley | Monte | Williams | 4.46 | 4.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | System issue? started 4.0 at a 4.52 APPL Index Above 4.5 all season except last 2 games | |
| 18240 | West Valley | Ming | Fu | 4.32 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 18126 | West Valley | Miki | Dammarell | 2.96 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Won 73% Approve | |
| 18208 | West Valley | Michelle | Vrolyks | 3.25 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Did not play in the 2025 season. Self rate allowed Approved to 4.0 | |
| 18222 | Southern | Michelle | Marrs | 2.5 | 3.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | Michelle Marrs was unable to play any matches last year even though she was rostered on the 3.0 team. Her father was ill and passed away and she was his caretaker. She practiced with the team when she was in town. She has applied for a medical appeal. She has no ratings at this time of any kind. |
|
| 17931 | East Valley | Michelle | Ford | 4.5 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | YES APPROVE Michelle barely went over 4.5 with a 4.51 | |
| 17898 | East Valley | michelle | shumaker | 4.05 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE from 4.05 TO 3.5 I think Michelle should stay at 3.5 for another year and see how her statistics are next year. | |
| 17877 | West Valley | Michele | Follger | 4.28 | 4.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Approve | |
| 18008 | West Valley | Michael | Christianson | 3.76 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | 75% wins Approve | |
| 17785 | Southern | Michael | Treiberg | 3.47 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | he won 15 games and lost 3 last year with a different partner each match. his dupr is 4.016. I have seen him play at ACE and he is definitely a 4.0 He plays as a mixed doubles partner with a 4.5 player that I know well. Recommend approval even though it is up two levels. He was obviously miss assigned. | |
| 19389 | Southern | Michael | Duwe | 3.66 | 3.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | Michael played in the APPL league 2023-2025. He is 75 yo, his current APPL Index Rating is 3.66 and he would like to appeal/play 3.0. In 2023, his rating was not affected due to playing in a merged/pilot division. In 2024, he played in a combined 50+/65+ 3.5 flight, won 6 games and lost 18 games. In 2025, he played in a 65+ 3.5 flight, won 18 games and lost 18 games. He is requesting an appeal based on a medical condition, arthritis/tendonitis in his playing wrist. Based on last year results, he seems to be at the correct level (3.5) |
|
| 17844 | East Valley | Megan | Macpherson | 4.15 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | REJECT APPEAL Did play in a division including 3.0 teams, but it was to my understanding that those games did not count toward APPL index. MOST teams in division were 3.5 teams and Megan won over 80% of games |
|
| 18568 | East Valley | Meg | Tippin | 3.29 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 3.28 TO 3.5 Would dominate at 3.0 | |
| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
