Displaying 76 - 100 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
18115East ValleyWilliam (Bill)Wayne4.554.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT 4.5 to 4.0
BILL IS 67 and played against 50+ players and continues to improve.
Bill played over 100 games 2025 and won 75/lost 27.
290 W
170 L
Averaged almost 10 PPG
Wayne consistently went over 4.5 throughout the 2025 season. To make it over that 4.5 skill level takes good consistent playing esp. with as many games as he played on two teams.
Wayne played with multiple partners and performed very well thru out the season on a 50+ AND a 65+ team. Wayne will be competitive at 4.5.

We "cannot" go here with this one.....even with all the statistics they have submitted, it just doesn't add up.

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18125West ValleyTrynnaJohnson2.783.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18172East ValleyKrisGrsnsttom4.534.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT
Played a lot of games last year on 2 teams
Men's and Mxd at 4.0
Climbed consistently all season
I see he "split" games with Bill Wayne who we have also denied appeal to 4.0 from 4.5
W 786 L599
Averages almost 10 ppg
54W 30LKris is strong and needs to play at 4.5 or he will totally dominate this year at 4.0

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18222SouthernMichelleMarrs2.53.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Michelle Marrs was unable to play any matches last year even though she was rostered on the 3.0 team. Her father was ill and passed away and she was his caretaker. She practiced with the team when she was in town. She has applied for a medical appeal.
She would like to remain on the 3.0 team.
I would like to grant the appeal due to the fact that she was caring for a dying family member and never got a chance to prove herself.

She has no ratings at this time of any kind.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18223West ValleyKurtisAmend4.324.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18240West ValleyMingFu4.323.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
18244West ValleyTerriMims2.683.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18245West ValleyTerriMims2.683.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • Duplicate Appeal
18258East ValleyChristaRoberts4.03.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT
Christa won 9 lost 15 @4.0
181W 217 L
Average 7ppg
Christa is right where she needs to be at 4.0.
She clearly has the skills to be competitive at 4.0

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18292West ValleyDebbieAndrews3.274.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

w 21 l27

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18299West ValleyRodrigoPerez-Zambrano3.64.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

w-7 Lost 11
2025 first season. Roster rating at 3.70 went down to 3.6

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18316East ValleyLynnJones3.53.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT

Index 3.59
Won 43 Lost 11
80% Win
554won 282lost
9.88 ppg average

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18729SouthernAudreyCampbell3.243.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Audrey is requesting an appeal from 3.24 to 3.5. She feels that the Appl index does not adequately show her skills.
In 2025 she played 3.5 winning 8 games and losing 10. her index started at 3.23 and ended at 2.34
In 2024 she played 3.5 and started at 3.27 and went down to 3.23
playing 3.0 in 2023 she started at the assigned 3.2 level and increased to 3.27 as a 3.0.

I just don't see that there is any marked improvement over a three year span that warrants such a high rating jump. I recommend she be denied,

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18731SouthernDavidScaglione4.614.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

David has a rating of 4.61 and was asking to appeal down to continue to play with his. same team at 4.0. His main reason was his work schedule. He also stated that he would like to be hooked. up with a 4.5 team if denied.

Since Appl policy is to deny playing down except in very specific conditions (usually medical) I referred him to Scot Ritchie who is the 4.5 coordinator here in Tucson.

Recommend denial due to Appl policy.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18773East ValleyDaveLeach3.143.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT

started at 3.7 ended 3.1
won 4 lost 32
155 won
376 lost
ave 4ppg

Can't justify 3.5 index

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18801West ValleyCherylNitahara4.745.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • Player is already at the desired Roster Rating
18922West ValleyKariAnderson3.474.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

wins 9
losses 33
performance declined in 2025 in 4.0
probably best in 3.5

Decline and encouraged to submit an appeal to 3.5

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19020SouthernJillAnderson3.714.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Jill is a 3.71 wishing to play at 4.0. She started 2.25 at 3.87 and dropped each game. She played one match in January and one match in March. She won only 33 points in 12 games which averages less than 3 pts per game. She had 132 points scored against her.

She said she has done lots of drilling and work on the court this summer, which I think is good, however, there really is not enough data to warrant the 4.0 jump.

In 2024 she played 3 matches in mixed double 3.5. She was competitive. Her rating went from 3.7 to 3.87 which qualified her for a fast track appeal to 4.0 this past year.

I have no idea if she has a dupr. The only Jill Anderson I could find that was close in age had a rating of 3.52

I do not feel that her current rating shows that she is strong enough to play 4.0. I recommend another year at 3.5 and she can play on 4.0 as an exception if they have room.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19068SouthernNatalieCarey3.123.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Natalie would like to appeal her 3.12 rating to play 3.5

She played six matches last season. 2 at 3.5 and 4 at 3.0
She started 3.0 and ended at 3.12. In 2024 she started at 3.2 and went to 3.0. No history of her rating increasing.

In 3.0 she won 6 games and lost 12. She scored a total of 120 points while 166 were scored by her opponents.
In 3.5 she won 7 games and lost 5 with her total points bing 105 and the opponents being 106.

She started the 2024 season at 3.2 and ended at 3.0 and then inn 2025 she started at 3.0 and never got any higher than 3.12 with much of the season being lower than 3.0.

Her stats kind of give mixed signals but I feel like over a two year period her rating has been flat making me believe that she needs another year at 3.0.

I recommend denial

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19610East ValleyJohnReed2.53.5PendingRoster Rating Appeal Approve/Reject

Duplicate appeal

  • Duplicate Appeal
19271SouthernFranBade3.914.0PendingRoster Rating Appeal Approve/Reject

I cannot find Fran Bade in the team section of admin at all. She shows up under members as a 4.0 self-rated player. She says she played last year.... there is no record of her ever playing. 11/2 I sent her an email letting her know I need more information from. her like a team name as she does not show up.
19465West ValleyBelindaRude3.503.0PendingRoster Rating Appeal Approve/Reject
  • Duplicate Appeal
19686SouthernAarynGiblin2.53.0PendingRoster Rating Appeal Review
19478East ValleyMasakoFord3.54.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Self rate 4.0
Has but played since 2022
19410East ValleyJosephNettemeyer4.294.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

4.29 to 4.5
Played on 4.5 last year. 18+
Had a groin injury in 25 so had a hard time competing at that level. Is better now and wants to continue at 4.5

141 won. 242 lost.

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason