| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17912 | Southern | GREG | SCHOENBERG | 3.65 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | comes from small Tubac team Last year ended 3.65 65+ mixed team This creates a hard dilemma for the Tubac team with limited players. Greg has a much better win loss record in 65+ than in 50 + he definitely qualifies for the 65+ no exception limit. check to see the number of exceptions on 50+ already |
|
| 18088 | West Valley | Hayley | Useldinger | 2.67 | 3.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 18586 | Southern | Helen | Vinson | 3.52 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Helen has not played outside of the White Mountain APPL leagues since 2022. Her ending rating in 2022 was a 3.52. Since we cannot use White Mountain ratings and I have no access to anything other than the southern region I am unable to look anything up. With that being said, Helen has applied on a medical appeal. PER HELEN In March of 2025 I was diagnosed with Acanthamoeba Keratitis and as a result of the infection I am currently blind in my left eye. I have been unable to play pickleball at all for almost 6 months. I was on a team up in the White Mountains this summer but because of the pain, doctor's appointments in Tucson, and the inability to play at a competitive level with my team I did not participate. I am just getting back on the courts and doing the best I can with one eye. I am hoping to have a cornea transplant once they eye tissue is healthy enough, but even then, it is uncertain if I will have my sight back. Since she did not play at. all this season and. her APPl rating from the Southern Region is stale, I would like to have her approved either as a self-rated player or allow her appeal to the 3.0 level being only .02 above 4 years ago. She is blind in one eye which would make depth perception almost impossible. I ask that she be approved. | |
| 17967 | East Valley | Henrietta | Wong | 3.09 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 3.09 to 3.5 Greg M agrees | |
| 17773 | West Valley | Hoo Yin | Wong | 3.82 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Should have submitted a Fast Track. I approved rather than asking them to resubmit — outcome is the same. | |
| 19134 | West Valley | Jack | Bahlman | 4.01 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Did not play in 2025, numerous medical issues Sell rating via Appeal | |
| 17816 | West Valley | JAKE | LUCERO | 3.27 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 17938 | Southern | James | A Strickland | 2.78 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | This one was a real pain. I had to look up every single person played as there is no indication within the rating if they were the 18+ team.....ugh As a 50+ player. He won 15 games, lost 23 Against the 18+ he won 2 games, lost 8 This player was born in 1961 In his losses he lost 1 game to players born in 1976 and 1979 3 of his games lost were to people less than 10 years younger than him. In the 18+ matches his rating dropped a total of .15. Added back into his final rating that brings him to a 2.93. Enough for an auto appeal. | |
| 18043 | East Valley | James | Johnson | 3.43 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 3.44 to 3.5 | |
| 17858 | West Valley | Jane | Pulvermacher | 4.60 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 18311 | West Valley | Janene | Coltom | 3.36 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | dominated 3.0 | |
| 17839 | Casa Grande | Janett | Kline | 3.83 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 17872 | West Valley | Jean | Denslow | 3.54 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 18914 | Southern | Jean | Bustard | 3.83 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Jean played in a mixed division with 4.0 50+ and 4.0 18+ players. Our division was the only one where the 18+ were counted against us. All other divisions they were thrown out and not counted. Many of the 18+ players by the time she played against her had reached rating of 4.58, 4.6. If you take the 18+ match off it raises her back up to a 3.89 she would have qualified for a fast track appeal. She did not play in 2024 so there is no recent information outside this year to consider. Did not win a single game in the three matches. The other two matches were against the state champion 4.0 50+ women. We had a tough league. I recommend she be allowed to play 4.0 | |
| 19140 | East Valley | Jeanne | Seger | 2.99 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 2.99 EAST VALLEY INDEX FROM 2023 Jeanne is only .01 from 3.0 East Valley from '23 | |
| 17866 | Southern | Jeannie | Antonucci | 2.5 | 3.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | Jeannie had heart surgery. She was listed on a roster but never played a game. She has no other appl history. There is a jeannie Antonnuci in DUPR but no identifiers to know if it was her. Her PBB is 2.875 I told her she needed to do a self ratings assessment and turn it into her captain. They could then choose to add her or not. I said this appeal would be denied as there is no information to support the request. |
|
| 18106 | Southern | Jeff | Schmitt | 4.64 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | He wants to play 4.0 with a rating of 4.64. Dupr is 4.228 and current as of August. He won 41 games and lost 12. He played this in a mixed flight of 50/65 4.0/4.5 he is unwilling to travel out of Saddlebrook to player on a higher level team as his community will not have a 4.5 team. | |
| 17864 | East Valley | Jeffrey | Jacobs | 3.35 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | YES APPROVE Greg M Agrees Played Casa Grande with a 3.87 Current rating | |
| 18170 | Casa Grande | Jennifer | Roberts | 3.00 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 18879 | West Valley | Jennifer | Woodard | 3.41 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 19112 | East Valley | Jennifer | Chesrown | 3.5 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE Jennifer w6 lost 6 3.5 team does not want her because captain told her she is not a 3.5 | |
| 19239 | Southern | Jennifer | Harding | 3.96 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Jennifer is requesting to move from 3.5 to 4.0. Her Appl index is 3.96. she played 46 matches winning 32 and losing 16. Her DUPR is 4.51. She played in two Dupr tournaments over the past 2 years for a total of 7 games total over both matches. Her dupr rose fro 3.58 to 4.51 over those seven games. I recommend the appeal approval. Dupr seems a little wild to me but match play in Appl was solid at 3.5 | |
| 19020 | Southern | Jill | Anderson | 3.71 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | Jill is a 3.71 wishing to play at 4.0. She started 2.25 at 3.87 and dropped each game. She played one match in January and one match in March. She won only 33 points in 12 games which averages less than 3 pts per game. She had 132 points scored against her. She said she has done lots of drilling and work on the court this summer, which I think is good, however, there really is not enough data to warrant the 4.0 jump. In 2024 she played 3 matches in mixed double 3.5. She was competitive. Her rating went from 3.7 to 3.87 which qualified her for a fast track appeal to 4.0 this past year. I have no idea if she has a dupr. The only Jill Anderson I could find that was close in age had a rating of 3.52 I do not feel that her current rating shows that she is strong enough to play 4.0. I recommend another year at 3.5 and she can play on 4.0 as an exception if they have room. |
|
| 18116 | East Valley | Jim | Knaut | 3.65 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 3.65 TO 4.0 | |
| 19017 | West Valley | Jim | Seaman | 3.95 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Close to and above 4.0 all season. | |
| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
