Displaying 101 - 125 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
18729SouthernAudreyCampbell3.243.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Audrey is requesting an appeal from 3.24 to 3.5. She feels that the Appl index does not adequately show her skills.
In 2025 she played 3.5 winning 8 games and losing 10. her index started at 3.23 and ended at 2.34
In 2024 she played 3.5 and started at 3.27 and went down to 3.23
playing 3.0 in 2023 she started at the assigned 3.2 level and increased to 3.27 as a 3.0.

I just don't see that there is any marked improvement over a three year span that warrants such a high rating jump. I recommend she be denied,

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18723West ValleyNatalieBoles2.262.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
18722West ValleyNatalieBoles2.262.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
18715West ValleyLynneAiken2.332.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
18690SouthernKarenBerry3.543.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Karen is requesting approval to play down from 3.54 to 3.0. She has not been active in Appl since 2023.
She played 3.0 in in 2022 starting at 3.2 and ending at 3.54. As a 3.0 she won 39 games and lost 9. She was moved to 3.5 with her starting rating of 3.54
as a 3.5 player she won 18 games and loss 40.
Her rating in 3.5 in 19 of the 58 games reached 3.5, while going no higher than 3.57. The rest of the games her rating was 3.5 or below.

Karen has taken it upon herself to do the self-rating and rated out at 3.0. I have known Karen since 2021 and know her to be honest and straightforward. My teams have played against her over the years as 3.0 and 3.5. She only won one game of my teams in any of the encounters. We played her 4x over two seasons.

I believe that Karen would do well in the 3.0 league and be able to build back up to the 3.5 level.

18672East ValleyBarbieAustin3.333.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

24 / 25 played 3.5

259 won
394 lost

Is competitive at 3.5 and where she needs to be
Will dominate at 3.0
18618East ValleyDeannaHeywood4.023.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

REJECT

Index over 4.0 24/25
23 she index was 3.9-over 4.0
Not sure how she played 3.5 in 24 as her index was over 4.0 Maybe appeal?
Won 7 lost 5
100win 95 lost
8.3 ppl
Still Needs to play 4.0

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18586SouthernHelenVinson3.523.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Helen has not played outside of the White Mountain APPL leagues since 2022. Her ending rating in 2022 was a 3.52.

Since we cannot use White Mountain ratings and I have no access to anything other than the southern region I am unable to look anything up.

With that being said, Helen has applied on a medical appeal. PER HELEN In March of 2025 I was diagnosed with Acanthamoeba Keratitis and as a result of the infection I am currently blind in my left eye. I have been unable to play pickleball at all for almost 6 months. I was on a team up in the White Mountains this summer but because of the pain, doctor's appointments in Tucson, and the inability to play at a competitive level with my team I did not participate.

I am just getting back on the courts and doing the best I can with one eye. I am hoping to have a cornea transplant once they eye tissue is healthy enough, but even then, it is uncertain if I will have my sight back.

Since she did not play at. all this season and. her APPl rating from the Southern Region is stale, I would like to have her approved either as a self-rated player or allow her appeal to the 3.0 level being only .02 above 4 years ago. She is blind in one eye which would make depth perception almost impossible.

I ask that she be approved.

18568East ValleyMegTippin3.293.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

3.28 TO 3.5
Played 3.5 24/25 seasons
247pts won/346pts lost

Would dominate at 3.0
3.5 is where she needs to be
18316East ValleyLynnJones3.53.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT

Index 3.59
Won 43 Lost 11
80% Win
554won 282lost
9.88 ppg average

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18311West ValleyJaneneColtom3.363.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

dominated 3.0
w-37
lost -7
18303West ValleyKaraLandauer4.544.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Did not play in 2025

Self rate through Appeal
18299West ValleyRodrigoPerez-Zambrano3.64.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

w-7 Lost 11
2025 first season. Roster rating at 3.70 went down to 3.6

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18297West ValleyWayneMosser4.354.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Did not play in 2024 or 2025 seasons

Self rate through appeal process
18296West ValleyPatrickHansen4.434.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

did not play in 2025

DUPR recent, and above 4.5

Self rate through appeal
18295West ValleyLaraMosser4.34.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

hasn't played since 2023
DUPR over 4.5, and recent

Self-rating to 4.5 through appeal
18292West ValleyDebbieAndrews3.274.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

w 21 l27

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18287SouthernSueLinton3.573.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Sue is a 3.57 player who is asking to play down to a 3.0. She is 75 years old and wants to play doubles with her husband who is a 3.0 and is 82 years old. She was quite sick this past spring and has had a hard time recovering.

Sue and her husband played together last year in 30 games. They won 22 and lost 8. They gained 6 Appl points and allowed 12.

Sue's rating bobbed around all year going between the 3.37 she started with and peaked for one game at 3.6 before going back to a 3.55. While she was over 3.5 most of the season it was usually 3.51, 3.55.... she only hit 3.6 at one time and only for one game of one match.

While her husband COULD play up on a 3.5 team due to his age, his ratings are continuously low 3.2.

with that being said, is she better than 3.0 yes, at 75 playing a a 65+ should that give her some grace when she plays with an 82 year old partner.....

My feelings are if they are husband and wife and can even stand to play together on the same side.... they must be amazing people. I would vote yes based on age. But I realize I am pretty tenderhearted when it come to things like this.

18285SouthernEmmyMarshall3.333.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Emmy played on the 18+ La Paloma 3.0 team. This was a very limited league with only three teams in it. Emmy won 13 matches and lost 5. She gained three Appl points and allowed 6.

Emmy has been working on her game all summer with the pros at La Paloma. She also plays at ACE to see different competition.

She wants to improve her game by playing stronger players. She is .05 away from an auto appeal rating, however she did not play 3.5 last year.

I would recommend approval of the appeal to allow this player to continue to improve.

18279East ValleyAkikoElliott3.54.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

3.89
Should be fast track
played 4.0 in 2025
18272SouthernGeorgiaBeletsos3.934.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Georgia is a 3.93 wanting to appeal to 4.0. She started at the 3.7 for a new Appl player last year. During the regular season she played mix play. She won 20 games and lost 10. During those she gained 6 Appl points and gave away 10. Many of her matches were split win/loss.

It appears she 'can hang' with the 3.5 players and would like to play up for next year.

I recommend she be allowed to play up as she improved from a 3.7 to a 3.93 over the year.

18258East ValleyChristaRoberts4.03.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT
Christa won 9 lost 15 @4.0
181W 217 L
Average 7ppg
Christa is right where she needs to be at 4.0.
She clearly has the skills to be competitive at 4.0

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18249West ValleyOliviaNichols3.504.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Did not play in 2025

Self rating
18245West ValleyTerriMims2.683.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • Duplicate Appeal
18244West ValleyTerriMims2.683.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason