Displaying 126 - 150 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
17759SouthernReneeCraddock3.754.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

I am very familiar with this player. I was a sub on her team last year and played with her in two matches. We had never been on the court together before these matches. We did will winning approximately 50% of the games and getting the APPL point in the majority of the games. The team went on to win State. Renee played only four matches all year, two with me and two with a 4.18 player. Their results were similar to mine. At state only one of the matches was reported. Renee played with yet two new partners at state. Renee is a very strong player coming from a high level tennis background. She had her knee replaced two years ago so was unable to play that season. She came back this year very strong. She is one of the players that people like to play with as she understands strategy and is thoughtful about how her shot affect her partner. She drills with me and plays multiple times pers week in round robin play with 4.0 to 4.5 players. Her rating has steadily increased over the years and given the right partnership this year on our team, she will likely raise her rating to over 4.0. I believer her play style and play lever warrant the rating of 4.0
17819West ValleyPamelaSmith3.734.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17954West ValleyKendallEskew3.734.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete
18011East ValleyLizDubisar3.724.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE 3.72 to 4.0
Liz stayed right at 3.9 mostly the entire 2025 season until the last 3 games.
Liz has a DUPR & UTPR over 4.0
Played 4.0 in 22/23/24/25 seasons
253 pts won : 362pts loss
Liz is where she needs to be at 4.0
17888West ValleyToriBenz-Hillstrom3.714.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17923West ValleyDanielSeverino3.714.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18923East ValleyMarcGrenier3.714.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE
221 W 281 lost
7.5 ppl

DUPR 4/117
Winning tournaments at 4.0

Needs to be at 4.0
Will dominate at 3.5
19020SouthernJillAnderson3.714.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Jill is a 3.71 wishing to play at 4.0. She started 2.25 at 3.87 and dropped each game. She played one match in January and one match in March. She won only 33 points in 12 games which averages less than 3 pts per game. She had 132 points scored against her.

She said she has done lots of drilling and work on the court this summer, which I think is good, however, there really is not enough data to warrant the 4.0 jump.

In 2024 she played 3 matches in mixed double 3.5. She was competitive. Her rating went from 3.7 to 3.87 which qualified her for a fast track appeal to 4.0 this past year.

I have no idea if she has a dupr. The only Jill Anderson I could find that was close in age had a rating of 3.52

I do not feel that her current rating shows that she is strong enough to play 4.0. I recommend another year at 3.5 and she can play on 4.0 as an exception if they have room.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17748SouthernJulieZeilenga3.694.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

I have mixed feelings. This person has no documentable history of her skills either in pickleball or tennis since 2022.. My tennis playing friends state that a 4.0 tennis is like a 3.5 pickleball. She states she plays with 4.0 players but what does that even mean? Her rating from 2022 is 3.69. I feel that the fact that she had no documentation is too great. Her Dupr is 3.545. She has no pickleball brackets account. She has 2 wins and 6 losses in 3.5 in Dupr with the most recent one played in 2024

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19299West ValleyPhyllisHubatch3.683.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete
19396West ValleyValVollmin3.674.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Played in merged flights with 5.0's in pilot years
19389SouthernMichaelDuwe3.663.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Michael played in the APPL league 2023-2025. He is 75 yo, his current APPL Index Rating is 3.66 and he would like to appeal/play 3.0. In 2023, his rating was not affected due to playing in a merged/pilot division. In 2024, he played in a combined 50+/65+ 3.5 flight, won 6 games and lost 18 games. In 2025, he played in a 65+ 3.5 flight, won 18 games and lost 18 games. He is requesting an appeal based on a medical condition, arthritis/tendonitis in his playing wrist. Based on last year results, he seems to be at the correct level (3.5)

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17873East ValleyJuneGill3.653.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

NO REJECT

June won 80% of games in 2025
SPLIT 12% and only lost 7%

She will totally dominate with any partner she plays with and she did play with many different partners which also shows she is dominating at 3.0

June is 65, no apparant medical issues so I feel she should stay at 3.5 where she will be competitive.
She is not on a community based team as she states so should be able to find another team at 3.5

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17912SouthernGREGSCHOENBERG3.654.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

comes from small Tubac team
he states tubac needs him for the sixth male on the 50+ 4,0 team

Last year ended 3.65
50+ mixed team 1 win 9 loses
gave up 2 appl points and won 3 appl points

65+ mixed team
20 wins 22 losses
gave up 15 appl points and earned 9 appl points
65+ mens team
18 wins and 12 losses
gave up 8 appl points and earned 5 appl points

This creates a hard dilemma for the Tubac team with limited players. Greg has a much better win loss record in 65+ than in 50 +

he definitely qualifies for the 65+ no exception limit.
He really should play as an exception on the 50+ team.

check to see the number of exceptions on 50+ already

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18116East ValleyJimKnaut3.654.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE 3.65 TO 4.0
Played all 2025 season with Meniscus tear and a lot of pain affecting his W/L. The meniscus tears in his knee (which to quote the doctor, looked like shredded crab) were surgically repaired in July and he is now back to full speed.
His team got 2nd state 2025 and will now be playing 4.0.
He won about 50% of his games with his bad knee.
He had medical issues, got them fixed and now ready to go strong....
17859East ValleyAJStroud3.623.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT APPEAL

Both AJ and her partner Jen Dale did well at 3.5
Just because her partner did not move up to 3.5 is not a reason to play 18+ @ 3.0.
I would suggest Jen do an appeal to 3.5 if they want to continue to play together. Jen's current rating is 3.42 and could easily get an appeal to 3.5.
These two would DOMINATE at 3.0.

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17837East ValleyLynRube3.614.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT 3.61 TO 4.0.
65+ TEAM
Lyn is 65 and can play on 4.0 team
Lynn's performance in '25 declined to her significant drop below 4.0

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18168East ValleyEarlAmkin3.613.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE
Medical Appeal
Earl's INDEX has consistently gone down since '22 /'23
playing first in the East Valley. Earl moved to Casa Grande region in 24 and 25 for less competition because of his back issues. His Index continued to decline even in Casa Grande. Early ended the 25 season with a 3.33 rating. Earl feels he needs to be able to play safely in East Valley at 3.0.
His last rating in East Valley from 2023 was 3.61 which does not reflect his recent play.
18730SouthernEdwardWatson3.613.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Edward has no recent Appl history and should enter as a self-rated player. He has been notified of. this.

18299West ValleyRodrigoPerez-Zambrano3.64.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

w-7 Lost 11
2025 first season. Roster rating at 3.70 went down to 3.6

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19098West ValleySherryHarleman3.583.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

w 3, l- 18
had surgery
2025 first year, probably should have started at 3.0
18287SouthernSueLinton3.573.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Sue is a 3.57 player who is asking to play down to a 3.0. She is 75 years old and wants to play doubles with her husband who is a 3.0 and is 82 years old. She was quite sick this past spring and has had a hard time recovering.

Sue and her husband played together last year in 30 games. They won 22 and lost 8. They gained 6 Appl points and allowed 12.

Sue's rating bobbed around all year going between the 3.37 she started with and peaked for one game at 3.6 before going back to a 3.55. While she was over 3.5 most of the season it was usually 3.51, 3.55.... she only hit 3.6 at one time and only for one game of one match.

While her husband COULD play up on a 3.5 team due to his age, his ratings are continuously low 3.2.

with that being said, is she better than 3.0 yes, at 75 playing a a 65+ should that give her some grace when she plays with an 82 year old partner.....

My feelings are if they are husband and wife and can even stand to play together on the same side.... they must be amazing people. I would vote yes based on age. But I realize I am pretty tenderhearted when it come to things like this.

17749West ValleyGordonCowher3.563.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19640West ValleyDianeSantos3.563.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Medical

Did not play in 2025
17783West ValleyDottieJacobs3.554.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason