Roster Rating Standard Appeal

REJECT APPEAL

Both AJ and her partner Jen Dale did well at 3.5
Just because her partner did not move up to 3.5 is not a reason to play 18+ @ 3.0.
I would suggest Jen do an appeal to 3.5 if they want to continue to play together. Jen's current rating is 3.42 and could easily get an appeal to 3.5.
These two would DOMINATE at 3.0.

• Information provided does not support the Appeal
• APPL history of results does not support the Appeal

After multiple conversations with Pam about a fast track appeal as she qualifies.....
she said she was denied the first one at this rating.
I asked her to resubmit and she said it wouldn't let her.

Approve the appeal as it really qualifies for a fast track but technology glitches or operator error are making it impossible to submit the appropriate one.

Jeannie had heart surgery. She was listed on a roster but never played a game. She has no other appl history. There is a jeannie Antonnuci in DUPR but no identifiers to know if it was her. Her PBB is 2.875

I told her she needed to do a self ratings assessment and turn it into her captain. They could then choose to add her or not. I said this appeal would be denied as there is no information to support the request.

• APPL history of results does not support the Appeal

YES APPROVE to 3.5

Won all her games in 2024 @3.5 18+ and split ONE
Dominated at 3.0
Young player, strong and moving up

No games in 2025

• APPL history of results does not support the Appeal

Dana started at 3.30 and ended at 3.30 after 32 games. she had 14 wins and 18 losses. She earned 10 appl points in the 18 losses and gave up 6 appl points in the 14 wins.

The highest she ever got was a 3.38. Never reached 3.5.
I don't think it warrants the 3.5 request.

• APPL history of results does not support the Appeal

suzanne started at the given rate of 3.2 and ended at 2.8. Her rating progressed steadily downward.
Mixed play
6 wins 18 losses
appl points scored 5 appl points allowed 1
womens
5 wins 13 losses
appl points scored 7 appl points allowed
The suzanne richards that is 72 as our appl states does not have a pb brackets rating. Her dupr is 2.943 which comes only from a ladder league within her community and no tournament play

she states she has rotator cuff issues.
I don't recommend approval

• Duplicate Appeal

dominated 4.0 , w29 l- 5
state 9-3

may have started at too low of a rating

incorrect start rating -- 2.52, should have been 2.70

W 15, L 3 dominated 2.5

Candace started 2025 season as a high 3.5 at 3.93
She stayed over 4.0 the entire season and won the majority of games in doubles and mixed.

I would suggest if she wants to play with her same partners they could possibly appeal to 4.0 as they are higher level 3.5 players as well.

Candace will be competitive at 4.0

Her reasoning to stay at 3.5 is to play with the same partners.

• Information provided does not support the Appeal
• APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
• Medical reasoning does not support the Appeal