| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19017 | West Valley | Jim | Seaman | 3.95 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Close to and above 4.0 all season. | |
| 19036 | West Valley | ZOE | COPENHAVER | 2.99 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Good w/L record | |
| 19039 | West Valley | Pam | Leeming | 2.88 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Didn't play in 2025, only 6 games in 2024 Self rating via Appeal process | |
| 19049 | West Valley | Kerrie | Palermo | 4 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Last played in 2022 Self rating via Appeal process | |
| 19059 | West Valley | Barbara | Olesen | 4.1 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Last played APPl in 2022 Self Rating via Appeal | |
| 19066 | West Valley | Tamara | Ramsey | 4.03 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Has not played since 2022 Fast track through appeals | |
| 19088 | West Valley | Vicki | Ryan | 4.11 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Didn't play 2024 season Self rating via appeal process | |
| 19098 | West Valley | Sherry | Harleman | 3.58 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | w 3, l- 18 | |
| 19108 | West Valley | Vicki | Ryan | 4.11 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 19134 | West Valley | Jack | Bahlman | 4.01 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Did not play in 2025, numerous medical issues Sell rating via Appeal | |
| 17748 | Southern | Julie | Zeilenga | 3.69 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | I have mixed feelings. This person has no documentable history of her skills either in pickleball or tennis since 2022.. My tennis playing friends state that a 4.0 tennis is like a 3.5 pickleball. She states she plays with 4.0 players but what does that even mean? Her rating from 2022 is 3.69. I feel that the fact that she had no documentation is too great. Her Dupr is 3.545. She has no pickleball brackets account. She has 2 wins and 6 losses in 3.5 in Dupr with the most recent one played in 2024 |
|
| 17757 | Southern | Sandra | Hubbard | 3.33 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | This player has steadily declined since her start at 3.7 in 2024. She ended the mixed season in 2024 at 3.24. 2025 she played gender doubles and only raised her rating by .09. She played six matches all with the same partner. They won 14 games and lost 22. They scored 4 appl points in their 22 losses and allowed 8 appl points in their 14 wins. Her dupr rating is 3.239 and she has no history in pickleball brackets. I do not believe that the fact that she disagrees with her rating is sufficient to warrant and increased rating for appeal to 3.5 |
|
| 17759 | Southern | Renee | Craddock | 3.75 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | I am very familiar with this player. I was a sub on her team last year and played with her in two matches. We had never been on the court together before these matches. We did will winning approximately 50% of the games and getting the APPL point in the majority of the games. The team went on to win State. Renee played only four matches all year, two with me and two with a 4.18 player. Their results were similar to mine. At state only one of the matches was reported. Renee played with yet two new partners at state. Renee is a very strong player coming from a high level tennis background. She had her knee replaced two years ago so was unable to play that season. She came back this year very strong. She is one of the players that people like to play with as she understands strategy and is thoughtful about how her shot affect her partner. She drills with me and plays multiple times pers week in round robin play with 4.0 to 4.5 players. Her rating has steadily increased over the years and given the right partnership this year on our team, she will likely raise her rating to over 4.0. I believer her play style and play lever warrant the rating of 4.0 | |
| 17762 | Southern | Bill | Gray | 2.73 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Bill has played on two teams this past year. He attached medical documentation of his arm being injured. His play in 2024 was steady just over the 3.0 mark. You can see the drop as 2025 goes along that lines up with this arm injury. | |
| 17785 | Southern | Michael | Treiberg | 3.47 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | he won 15 games and lost 3 last year with a different partner each match. his dupr is 4.016. I have seen him play at ACE and he is definitely a 4.0 He plays as a mixed doubles partner with a 4.5 player that I know well. Recommend approval even though it is up two levels. He was obviously miss assigned. | |
| 17787 | Southern | Suzanne | Richards | 2.8 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | In 2025 Suzanne played both mixed and gender doubles. Gender: Mixed: Dupr is 2.943 She said she played injured last year. Player is 72 years old. The only thing that makes me want to honor the appeal is the injury and the dupr rating. Her wins and loses do not support it but at 72 she is still playing so maybe she earns it by determination. | |
| 17790 | Southern | Sherry | Elwood | 2.5 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Deny this appeal. Player qualifies for a fast track appeal. Rating is 2.85. Told her this and asked her to submit a fast track appeal. 8/4/25 or approve this one | |
| 17794 | Southern | Nancy | Cuzman | 2.82 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Nancy has been a solid 3.0 player for several years. As a coach/captain, Nancy ends up playing with the players no one else wants to play with. Nancy has a good well rounded game. She dinks, can do overheads and thinks about strategy. Nancy is very slightly built and I believe her lack of strength is the only thing that keeps her from being a 3.5 player. I would approve Nancy's appeal as she has done the work to be a 3.0 but constantly puts others first. Her average rating this past year is 2.917 which is well within the auto appeal boundaries. | |
| 17814 | Southern | Pam | Holmes | 2.89 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Did not play in 2025 due to injury 2024 14 wins 15 losses earned 8 appl points, allowed 5 would have qualified for a fast track appeal. Recommend approval. | |
| 17841 | Southern | Curtis | Simpson | 4.53 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | Curtis Simpson is one of the players that caused a great deal of complaints last year regarding sandbagging. He played as a captain rated player on a 3.5 tear. He won 95 games and lost 7. At state he won 16 games and lost 3. Regular season saw him score 7 appl points in 7 losses and state had 4 appl points scored in 8 losses. Regular season saw 33 appl points scored against him in 95 wins and 5 appl points in 16 wins at state. His dupr is 3.956. HOWEVER he plays round robin mixers at an indoor club weekly with rotating partners for that dupr score. His dupr has never been over 4.0. Pb brackets is all blurred out and I cannot see it. I do not recommend approval of the appeal |
|
| 17845 | Southern | George | Patterson | 4.00 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | George is over 70 and wants to play in the newly formed 70+ 3.5 league. He lives at Saddlebrooke ranch. They do not allow outside players on their teams. He would make the 6th player. Unsure if it will be quad format or regular. His rating since 2022 has been in the high 3.5's. He got bumped up over 4.01 on a three game forfeit from another team. His highest rating was a 4.05. He has no valid dupr and his pb brackets is all blurred out so I can't access it. His dupr rating of 4.42 is from 2022 with only one game, not match recorded last year and the year before. They were both appl games and neither one of them was validated by the other party. 2025 he won 14 games, lost 10 He scored 8 appl points in 10 losses and had 5 appl points scored against him in 14 wins. His record was generally split games. George sees a podiatrist for chronic foot pain for the past three years. Due to the 4.01 rating, wanting to play the over 70's team....recommend the approval. | |
| 17854 | Southern | Greg | Stroud | 4.12 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | Player states that his DUPR is 3.563 thereby justifying playing down. The DUPR rating is stale at 3/21 He won 47 games and lost 6. He allowed 19 appl points in the 47 wins and earned 5 appl points in the 6 losses. He states his partner 'carried him' His partner Craig Wessman started at 4.02 and went to 4.27 and increase of .25 and he started at 3.87 and went to 4.01. He increased by .14. He helped his partner go up by .25 while he also increased by .14 seems to me he earned his new rating with all his hard work..... recommend denying the appeal. |
|
| 17863 | Southern | Pam | Steube | 2.86 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | After multiple conversations with Pam about a fast track appeal as she qualifies..... Approve the appeal as it really qualifies for a fast track but technology glitches or operator error are making it impossible to submit the appropriate one. | |
| 17866 | Southern | Jeannie | Antonucci | 2.5 | 3.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | Jeannie had heart surgery. She was listed on a roster but never played a game. She has no other appl history. There is a jeannie Antonnuci in DUPR but no identifiers to know if it was her. Her PBB is 2.875 I told her she needed to do a self ratings assessment and turn it into her captain. They could then choose to add her or not. I said this appeal would be denied as there is no information to support the request. |
|
| 17870 | Southern | Elizabeth | Yuengling | 3.41 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | recommended she do a fast track appeal. | |
| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
