Displaying 151 - 175 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
17892West ValleySelenaHayes3.914.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17893East ValleyWilliamWayne4.554.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

NO REJECT

Wayne consistently went over 4.5 throughout the 2025 season. To make it over that 4.5 skill level takes good consistent playing esp with as many games as he played in two teams.

Wayne played with multiple partners and did well thru out the season on a 50+ and a 65+ team. Wayne will be competitive at 4.5.

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17895East ValleyDianneBirgenheir2.873.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE

Dianne played 2.5/3.0 division in 2025

Won some, lost some and split some

She should be consistent at 3.0 and competitive.
17898East Valleymichelleshumaker4.053.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE from 4.05 TO 3.5
Michelle won ONLY 50% of her games at 3.5
21:21
364 WON 368 LOST POINTS
Michelle played 3.0 in 2024, new to 3.5 in 2025.
Michelle did not dominate at 3.5 and another year at 3.5 will prepare her for 4.0 division.

I think Michelle should stay at 3.5 for another year and see how her statistics are next year.
17909East ValleyRobinCastriano2.793.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT 2.79 TO 3.0
Robin started season at 3.20 AS A NEW PLAYER
She won 2:22lost
152 won: 263Lost
Stay at 2.5

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17912SouthernGREGSCHOENBERG3.654.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

comes from small Tubac team
he states tubac needs him for the sixth male on the 50+ 4,0 team

Last year ended 3.65
50+ mixed team 1 win 9 loses
gave up 2 appl points and won 3 appl points

65+ mixed team
20 wins 22 losses
gave up 15 appl points and earned 9 appl points
65+ mens team
18 wins and 12 losses
gave up 8 appl points and earned 5 appl points

This creates a hard dilemma for the Tubac team with limited players. Greg has a much better win loss record in 65+ than in 50 +

he definitely qualifies for the 65+ no exception limit.
He really should play as an exception on the 50+ team.

check to see the number of exceptions on 50+ already

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17919SouthernSue KSmith3.904.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

qualifies as fast track appeal
17920SouthernMary AnnGarman3.233.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

appeal is not warranted. Lost 13 games, won one.

HOWEVER she would qualify for the new 65+ rule if she actually plays on a 65+ team.

how should this be handled

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17921West ValleyRobertNiedzwiecki3.784.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Didn't play in 2025.
Self rating now.
17922SouthernLeahHewitt3.914.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

qualifies as a fast track appeal

17923West ValleyDanielSeverino3.714.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17925West ValleyPegBarcelo4.234.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

RD and LC review and approval. Merger flights in pilot group counted and impacted rating.
17927West ValleyTerriSchaefers5.004.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17930West ValleyGillianHunn4.754.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

only played one match last year, it was her first season. Captain rated. Basically allowing her to self rate this season through the appeals process. Her rating should correct quickly competing at 4.0.
17931East ValleyMichelleFord4.54.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE

Michelle barely went over 4.5 with a 4.51
She won 64% of her games and lost 36%
She did not dominate at 4.0
Michelle is 66 and playing on 65+ team that finished 3/4 in that division.
Michelle has a bad knee and lists several PT appts, MRI and steroid injections.. her knee has not been replaced yet so she feels playing at a higher level could be a safety issue for her.
I feel we give her another year at 4.0, see how she plays out this season and gets her knee replacement .
17936West ValleyKarinSobotta5.555.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • Player is already at the desired Roster Rating
17938SouthernJamesA Strickland2.783.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

This one was a real pain. I had to look up every single person played as there is no indication within the rating if they were the 18+ team.....ugh

As a 50+ player. He won 15 games, lost 23
Earned 12 appl points and allowed 6.

Against the 18+ he won 2 games, lost 8
Earned 3 appl points and allowed 2

This player was born in 1961 In his losses he lost 1 game to players born in 1976 and 1979
2 games to players born in 1993 and 1966
and 2 games to players born in 1970 and 1969
He lost one game to players born in 1990 and 2000

3 of his games lost were to people less than 10 years younger than him.

In the 18+ matches his rating dropped a total of .15. Added back into his final rating that brings him to a 2.93. Enough for an auto appeal.

17942SouthernDahliaBowden3.253.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Dahlia at 3.0 with her rating being set at 3.2 as a new appl player.

She had 12 wins and 12 losses 5 appl pts earned and 3 allowed. Her ending rating was a 3.25

She is under 65 so no auto approval.

While she says her coach says she should play up, her appl numbers do not warrant an appeal up. There is no data to suggest she is ready for 3.5

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17944SouthernArdean Nickersonnickerson3.103.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

I asked her to resubmit as her info says she wants to play 3.5 but the data she put in says 3.10 appeal to 3.0,

rejected

17945SouthernArdean Nickersonnickerson3.103.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

denied except for 65+

she wants to play on a 65+ team

won 10 lost 20 at 3.0
allowed 8 appl earned 8 appl

Her scores don't relay the ability to move to 3.5. Only the 65+ appeal will help her.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17947Casa GrandeBrendaTipton3.363.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
17948Casa GrandeLynnCarroll3.213.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17949Casa GrandeBarbraFrizzell3.283.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17950Casa GrandeTracieMcBeth3.353.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
  • Duplicate Appeal
17951Casa GrandeBrendaTipton3.363.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
  • Duplicate Appeal
 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason