| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18923 | East Valley | Marc | Grenier | 3.71 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE DUPR 4/117 Needs to be at 4.0 | |
| 19020 | Southern | Jill | Anderson | 3.71 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | Jill is a 3.71 wishing to play at 4.0. She started 2.25 at 3.87 and dropped each game. She played one match in January and one match in March. She won only 33 points in 12 games which averages less than 3 pts per game. She had 132 points scored against her. She said she has done lots of drilling and work on the court this summer, which I think is good, however, there really is not enough data to warrant the 4.0 jump. In 2024 she played 3 matches in mixed double 3.5. She was competitive. Her rating went from 3.7 to 3.87 which qualified her for a fast track appeal to 4.0 this past year. I have no idea if she has a dupr. The only Jill Anderson I could find that was close in age had a rating of 3.52 I do not feel that her current rating shows that she is strong enough to play 4.0. I recommend another year at 3.5 and she can play on 4.0 as an exception if they have room. |
|
| 18011 | East Valley | Liz | Dubisar | 3.72 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 3.72 to 4.0 | |
| 17819 | West Valley | Pamela | Smith | 3.73 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 17954 | West Valley | Kendall | Eskew | 3.73 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 17759 | Southern | Renee | Craddock | 3.75 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | I am very familiar with this player. I was a sub on her team last year and played with her in two matches. We had never been on the court together before these matches. We did will winning approximately 50% of the games and getting the APPL point in the majority of the games. The team went on to win State. Renee played only four matches all year, two with me and two with a 4.18 player. Their results were similar to mine. At state only one of the matches was reported. Renee played with yet two new partners at state. Renee is a very strong player coming from a high level tennis background. She had her knee replaced two years ago so was unable to play that season. She came back this year very strong. She is one of the players that people like to play with as she understands strategy and is thoughtful about how her shot affect her partner. She drills with me and plays multiple times pers week in round robin play with 4.0 to 4.5 players. Her rating has steadily increased over the years and given the right partnership this year on our team, she will likely raise her rating to over 4.0. I believer her play style and play lever warrant the rating of 4.0 | |
| 17768 | East Valley | Sheri | Wheat | 3.76 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 3.76 to 4.0 Played 4.0 2025 season History support competitive at 4.0 |
|
| 18008 | West Valley | Michael | Christianson | 3.76 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | 75% wins Approve | |
| 17921 | West Valley | Robert | Niedzwiecki | 3.78 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Didn't play in 2025. | |
| 17825 | East Valley | Clarence | Lindblom | 3.79 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE appeal to 4.0 from 3.79 | |
| 18157 | East Valley | Trung | Lam | 3.79 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE | |
| 17826 | West Valley | Julie | Tisue | 3.80 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Should have been a Fast track. Julie played 4.0 last season. | |
| 18025 | West Valley | Ted | Duzan | 3.81 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 18052 | West Valley | Lupe | Shepard | 3.81 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | W 7, L 17 in 2025 season DUPR presented has only 4 games and 1% reliability |
|
| 17765 | East Valley | Karen | Schuman | 3.82 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 3.82 TO 4.0 Played 4.0 last year in Casa Grande 2025 History and Tournament play and DUPR and UTPR support 4.0 play | |
| 17773 | West Valley | Hoo Yin | Wong | 3.82 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Should have submitted a Fast Track. I approved rather than asking them to resubmit — outcome is the same. | |
| 17810 | East Valley | Cindy | Schutt | 3.83 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 3.83 to 4.0 34 W 32 L | |
| 17839 | Casa Grande | Janett | Kline | 3.83 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 17853 | East Valley | Kathy | Ream | 3.83 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | YES APPROVE 3.83 to 4.0. Greg M agrees Played 4.0 teams for 2 years | |
| 18098 | East Valley | angel | singer | 3.83 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | REJECT |
|
| 18914 | Southern | Jean | Bustard | 3.83 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Jean played in a mixed division with 4.0 50+ and 4.0 18+ players. Our division was the only one where the 18+ were counted against us. All other divisions they were thrown out and not counted. Many of the 18+ players by the time she played against her had reached rating of 4.58, 4.6. If you take the 18+ match off it raises her back up to a 3.89 she would have qualified for a fast track appeal. She did not play in 2024 so there is no recent information outside this year to consider. Did not win a single game in the three matches. The other two matches were against the state champion 4.0 50+ women. We had a tough league. I recommend she be allowed to play 4.0 | |
| 19233 | West Valley | Lisa | Marshall | 3.83 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Last played APPL in 2024 Self rating via Appeal process | |
| 17840 | East Valley | Mary | Waitrovich | 3.84 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 3.84 to 4.0 | |
| 18129 | East Valley | Lana | Williams | 3.85 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE | |
| 18110 | East Valley | mark | sharkey | 3.86 | 4.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 3.86 TO 4.0 | |
| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
