| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19162 | Southern | Nicole | Miller | 3.36 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | Nicole has a 3.36 rating and wants to appeal to 4.0. She won 8. matches and lost 14 at 3.5 this past season. She and her partner scored 168 points and the opponents scored 244. She states her DUPR is 4.078 from the most recent tournament last week. She played 3.0 not 3.5 while her dupr going in was a 3.567. The opponents were an average of 2.98 players. Her rating was artificially inflated by playing down in a league she was over qualified to play in. Her reading in APPL began this year at 3.52 and dropped match over match to 3.36. I feel like the DUPR is not accurate due to sandbagging in 3.0 and the Appl reflects that she did not hold her own in the 3.5 league. I don't recommend the approval as the stats do not warrant it. |
|
| 17805 | West Valley | Thomas | Ellison | 3.35 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 17864 | East Valley | Jeffrey | Jacobs | 3.35 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | YES APPROVE Greg M Agrees Played Casa Grande with a 3.87 Current rating | |
| 17950 | Casa Grande | Tracie | McBeth | 3.35 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 19680 | West Valley | LISA | M MATTSON | 3.35 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | Data does not support moving up. |
|
| 19681 | West Valley | LISA | M MATTSON | 3.35 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 17818 | West Valley | Joanne | Huckle | 3.34 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 17968 | Southern | Kim | Hehe | 3.34 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Kim's rating is .01 off a fast track appeal. Wants to appeal to 3.5 Over the past couple of years of play her rating has kind of danced all around the 3.2, 3.3 range. Never over a 3.5 When she played mixed her losses were 17 compared to 7 wins, 4 appl points earned and 8 allowed. That is a 41% win ratio in mixed. In gender doubles she was 50/50. She had five wins and five losses. She earned 4 appl points and allowed to. She speaks of two really dominant mixed teams and when I look at them I do see players that play 4.0 regularly in tournaments etc. That might account for the 41% ratio. She played in 50+ in both of those even though she qualified for 65+. I don't know if it is because Tubac only has 'x' number of teams available. I have reached out to Naomi Giles from Green Valley to see if she has an opinion on, or knows her play. No response She is qualified to play on a 65+ team if one is available in Tubac. Limited teams available there. I would be inclined keep her playing and say yes. She has 14 DUPR matches in 2024. 3.668 | |
| 18072 | Southern | Tracey | Rathjen | 3.34 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Tracey has a dupr of 3.896 and is .01 off of an auto appeal. She won 10 games and lost 14 she accrued 8 appl points while allowing only 3. Tracey may have lost quite a few games but actually split 6 of those 14 losses. Only once did she actually go over 3.5 last season but I feel that her dupr and the close number to the auto appeal should allow the appeal to be approved | |
| 17757 | Southern | Sandra | Hubbard | 3.33 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | This player has steadily declined since her start at 3.7 in 2024. She ended the mixed season in 2024 at 3.24. 2025 she played gender doubles and only raised her rating by .09. She played six matches all with the same partner. They won 14 games and lost 22. They scored 4 appl points in their 22 losses and allowed 8 appl points in their 14 wins. Her dupr rating is 3.239 and she has no history in pickleball brackets. I do not believe that the fact that she disagrees with her rating is sufficient to warrant and increased rating for appeal to 3.5 |
|
| 17795 | East Valley | Terri | Elletson | 3.33 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 3.34 TO 3.35 (RATING DISCREPANCY) | |
| 18285 | Southern | Emmy | Marshall | 3.33 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Emmy played on the 18+ La Paloma 3.0 team. This was a very limited league with only three teams in it. Emmy won 13 matches and lost 5. She gained three Appl points and allowed 6. Emmy has been working on her game all summer with the pros at La Paloma. She also plays at ACE to see different competition. She wants to improve her game by playing stronger players. She is .05 away from an auto appeal rating, however she did not play 3.5 last year. I would recommend approval of the appeal to allow this player to continue to improve. | |
| 18672 | East Valley | Barbie | Austin | 3.33 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 24 / 25 played 3.5 259 won Is competitive at 3.5 and where she needs to be | |
| 17869 | East Valley | Amy | Rounds | 3.31 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | YES APPROVE to 3.5 Won all her games in 2024 @3.5 18+ and split ONE No games in 2025 | |
| 17878 | Southern | Dana | Blumberg | 3.3 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | Dana started at 3.30 and ended at 3.30 after 32 games. she had 14 wins and 18 losses. She earned 10 appl points in the 18 losses and gave up 6 appl points in the 14 wins. The highest she ever got was a 3.38. Never reached 3.5. |
|
| 18839 | East Valley | Sharon | Bottock | 3.3 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE WON 12 Lost 24 | |
| 19333 | West Valley | Rafael | Juarbe | 3.30 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 19498 | East Valley | Cassie | Valentine | 3.3 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Approve | |
| 18568 | East Valley | Meg | Tippin | 3.29 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 3.28 TO 3.5 Would dominate at 3.0 | |
| 17949 | Casa Grande | Barbra | Frizzell | 3.28 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 17816 | West Valley | JAKE | LUCERO | 3.27 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 18292 | West Valley | Debbie | Andrews | 3.27 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | w 21 l27 |
|
| 19342 | West Valley | Debbie | Andrews | 3.27 | 4.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 19391 | West Valley | Debbie | Andrews | 3.27 | 3.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 17942 | Southern | Dahlia | Bowden | 3.25 | 3.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | Dahlia at 3.0 with her rating being set at 3.2 as a new appl player. She had 12 wins and 12 losses 5 appl pts earned and 3 allowed. Her ending rating was a 3.25 She is under 65 so no auto approval. While she says her coach says she should play up, her appl numbers do not warrant an appeal up. There is no data to suggest she is ready for 3.5 |
|
| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
