Displaying 201 - 225 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
19162SouthernNicoleMiller3.363.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Nicole has a 3.36 rating and wants to appeal to 4.0. She won 8. matches and lost 14 at 3.5 this past season. She and her partner scored 168 points and the opponents scored 244.

She states her DUPR is 4.078 from the most recent tournament last week. She played 3.0 not 3.5 while her dupr going in was a 3.567. The opponents were an average of 2.98 players. Her rating was artificially inflated by playing down in a league she was over qualified to play in.

Her reading in APPL began this year at 3.52 and dropped match over match to 3.36.

I feel like the DUPR is not accurate due to sandbagging in 3.0 and the Appl reflects that she did not hold her own in the 3.5 league.

I don't recommend the approval as the stats do not warrant it.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17805West ValleyThomasEllison3.353.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17864East ValleyJeffreyJacobs3.353.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE Greg M Agrees

Played Casa Grande with a 3.87 Current rating
Played '23 East valley 3.5
Played MXD and Doubles 3.5 in 2025
60 W 36 L 62%wins 886:732
DUPR 3.695

17950Casa GrandeTracieMcBeth3.353.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
  • Duplicate Appeal
19680West ValleyLISAM MATTSON3.354.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Data does not support moving up.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19681West ValleyLISAM MATTSON3.354.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17818West ValleyJoanneHuckle3.343.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
17968SouthernKimHehe3.343.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Kim's rating is .01 off a fast track appeal. Wants to appeal to 3.5

Over the past couple of years of play her rating has kind of danced all around the 3.2, 3.3 range. Never over a 3.5

When she played mixed her losses were 17 compared to 7 wins, 4 appl points earned and 8 allowed. That is a 41% win ratio in mixed.

In gender doubles she was 50/50. She had five wins and five losses. She earned 4 appl points and allowed to.

She speaks of two really dominant mixed teams and when I look at them I do see players that play 4.0 regularly in tournaments etc. That might account for the 41% ratio.

She played in 50+ in both of those even though she qualified for 65+. I don't know if it is because Tubac only has 'x' number of teams available.

I have reached out to Naomi Giles from Green Valley to see if she has an opinion on, or knows her play. No response

She is qualified to play on a 65+ team if one is available in Tubac. Limited teams available there. I would be inclined keep her playing and say yes.

She has 14 DUPR matches in 2024. 3.668

18072SouthernTraceyRathjen3.343.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Tracey has a dupr of 3.896 and is .01 off of an auto appeal. She won 10 games and lost 14 she accrued 8 appl points while allowing only 3.

Tracey may have lost quite a few games but actually split 6 of those 14 losses. Only once did she actually go over 3.5 last season but I feel that her dupr and the close number to the auto appeal should allow the appeal to be approved

17757SouthernSandraHubbard3.333.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

This player has steadily declined since her start at 3.7 in 2024. She ended the mixed season in 2024 at 3.24. 2025 she played gender doubles and only raised her rating by .09. She played six matches all with the same partner. They won 14 games and lost 22. They scored 4 appl points in their 22 losses and allowed 8 appl points in their 14 wins. Her dupr rating is 3.239 and she has no history in pickleball brackets. I do not believe that the fact that she disagrees with her rating is sufficient to warrant and increased rating for appeal to 3.5

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17795East ValleyTerriElletson3.333.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE 3.34 TO 3.35 (RATING DISCREPANCY)
Miss score at end of season at last game
Input shows 117-8
Barely under 3.5 most of the season (3.4)
Competitive at 3.5
W 14 L 20 Split 7
272 :432

18285SouthernEmmyMarshall3.333.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Emmy played on the 18+ La Paloma 3.0 team. This was a very limited league with only three teams in it. Emmy won 13 matches and lost 5. She gained three Appl points and allowed 6.

Emmy has been working on her game all summer with the pros at La Paloma. She also plays at ACE to see different competition.

She wants to improve her game by playing stronger players. She is .05 away from an auto appeal rating, however she did not play 3.5 last year.

I would recommend approval of the appeal to allow this player to continue to improve.

18672East ValleyBarbieAustin3.333.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

24 / 25 played 3.5

259 won
394 lost

Is competitive at 3.5 and where she needs to be
Will dominate at 3.0

17869East ValleyAmyRounds3.313.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE to 3.5

Won all her games in 2024 @3.5 18+ and split ONE
Dominated at 3.0
Young player, strong and moving up

No games in 2025

17878SouthernDanaBlumberg3.33.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Dana started at 3.30 and ended at 3.30 after 32 games. she had 14 wins and 18 losses. She earned 10 appl points in the 18 losses and gave up 6 appl points in the 14 wins.

The highest she ever got was a 3.38. Never reached 3.5.
I don't think it warrants the 3.5 request.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18839East ValleySharonBottock3.33.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

WON 12 Lost 24
239 WON 328 LOST
7ppg
PLAYED 3.5 for previous 3 years
Will still be competitive at 3.5
Middle ground
WILL donate at 3.0

19333West ValleyRafaelJuarbe3.303.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
19498East ValleyCassieValentine3.33.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Approve
Last played in 2023
Self rate 3.5

18568East ValleyMegTippin3.293.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

3.28 TO 3.5
Played 3.5 24/25 seasons
247pts won/346pts lost

Would dominate at 3.0
3.5 is where she needs to be

17949Casa GrandeBarbraFrizzell3.283.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17816West ValleyJAKELUCERO3.273.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18292West ValleyDebbieAndrews3.274.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

w 21 l27

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19342West ValleyDebbieAndrews3.274.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19391West ValleyDebbieAndrews3.273.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
17942SouthernDahliaBowden3.253.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Dahlia at 3.0 with her rating being set at 3.2 as a new appl player.

She had 12 wins and 12 losses 5 appl pts earned and 3 allowed. Her ending rating was a 3.25

She is under 65 so no auto approval.

While she says her coach says she should play up, her appl numbers do not warrant an appeal up. There is no data to suggest she is ready for 3.5

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason