| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18722 | West Valley | Natalie | Boles | 2.26 | 2.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 18723 | West Valley | Natalie | Boles | 2.26 | 2.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 19590 | East Valley | Donna | Rutledge | 3.0 | 2.5 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | Deny |
|
| 18753 | West Valley | Natalie | Boles | 2.26 | 2.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 18238 | East Valley | Sheryl | Erickson | 3.00 | 2.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE | |
| 17850 | East Valley | Femme | Sessions | 3.1 | 2.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | YES APPROVE APPEAL Greg M agrees 75 yr old playing 65+ wants to go TO 2.5 from 3.1. | |
| 19360 | West Valley | Lori | Juscius | 2.5 | 2.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 18715 | West Valley | Lynne | Aiken | 2.33 | 2.5 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 18007 | Southern | Robert | Salter | 2.83 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Robert played 34 games last yea He lost 24 mens doubles matches, won 3. He lost 4 mixed double and won 3. He earned 6 appl points in mens doubles and allowed 2. He won 3 apple points in mixed and allowed two. He struggled all year with leg issues eventually having surgery to correct it. He states that subs scores might have been attributed to him but I would have know way of knowing if this was accurate. He played in 65+ last year and can do so again this year if he so chooses. In adding up all matches both doubles and mixed his average rating is a 2.9. I believe that he should be granted the appeal based on that, due to the unknown of whose scores are actually entered and no way to find out. If he chooses to play 65+ he is able to regardless. Duper is 3.006 | |
| 18822 | West Valley | Catherine (Cati) | Ackley | 2.97 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | first year was 2025 | |
| 19299 | West Valley | Phyllis | Hubatch | 3.68 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 17794 | Southern | Nancy | Cuzman | 2.82 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Nancy has been a solid 3.0 player for several years. As a coach/captain, Nancy ends up playing with the players no one else wants to play with. Nancy has a good well rounded game. She dinks, can do overheads and thinks about strategy. Nancy is very slightly built and I believe her lack of strength is the only thing that keeps her from being a 3.5 player. I would approve Nancy's appeal as she has done the work to be a 3.0 but constantly puts others first. Her average rating this past year is 2.917 which is well within the auto appeal boundaries. | |
| 18316 | East Valley | Lynn | Jones | 3.5 | 3.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete | REJECT Index 3.59 |
|
| 17938 | Southern | James | A Strickland | 2.78 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | This one was a real pain. I had to look up every single person played as there is no indication within the rating if they were the 18+ team.....ugh As a 50+ player. He won 15 games, lost 23 Against the 18+ he won 2 games, lost 8 This player was born in 1961 In his losses he lost 1 game to players born in 1976 and 1979 3 of his games lost were to people less than 10 years younger than him. In the 18+ matches his rating dropped a total of .15. Added back into his final rating that brings him to a 2.93. Enough for an auto appeal. | |
| 18050 | West Valley | Katie | Fender | 2.5 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | ||
| 17960 | East Valley | Donna | Varnell | 2.97 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 18126 | West Valley | Miki | Dammarell | 2.96 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Won 73% Approve | |
| 19098 | West Valley | Sherry | Harleman | 3.58 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | w 3, l- 18 | |
| 19640 | West Valley | Diane | Santos | 3.56 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Medical Did not play in 2025 | |
| 17990 | East Valley | Geri | Luciani | 2.75 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE to 3.0 | |
| 19036 | West Valley | ZOE | COPENHAVER | 2.99 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Good w/L record | |
| 18125 | West Valley | Trynna | Johnson | 2.78 | 3.0 | Rejected | Workflow Complete |
| |
| 17966 | East Valley | Donna | Varnell | 2.94 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | YES APPROVE ONLY .06 FROM 3.0 PLAYED SCOTTSDALE LEAGUE IN 2025 | |
| 18287 | Southern | Sue | Linton | 3.57 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | Sue is a 3.57 player who is asking to play down to a 3.0. She is 75 years old and wants to play doubles with her husband who is a 3.0 and is 82 years old. She was quite sick this past spring and has had a hard time recovering. Sue and her husband played together last year in 30 games. They won 22 and lost 8. They gained 6 Appl points and allowed 12. Sue's rating bobbed around all year going between the 3.37 she started with and peaked for one game at 3.6 before going back to a 3.55. While she was over 3.5 most of the season it was usually 3.51, 3.55.... she only hit 3.6 at one time and only for one game of one match. While her husband COULD play up on a 3.5 team due to his age, his ratings are continuously low 3.2. with that being said, is she better than 3.0 yes, at 75 playing a a 65+ should that give her some grace when she plays with an 82 year old partner..... My feelings are if they are husband and wife and can even stand to play together on the same side.... they must be amazing people. I would vote yes based on age. But I realize I am pretty tenderhearted when it come to things like this. | |
| 18105 | East Valley | Sheryl | Erickson | 2.72 | 3.0 | Approved | Workflow Complete | APPROVE 2.72 TO 3.0 | |
| Entry ID | Region | First | Last | APPL Index | Appeal To | Workflow Status | Workflow Step | Internal Review Notes | Reject Reason |
