Roster Rating Standard Appeal

NO REJECT

June won 80% of games in 2025
SPLIT 12% and only lost 7%

She will totally dominate with any partner she plays with and she did play with many different partners which also shows she is dominating at 3.0

June is 65, no apparant medical issues so I feel she should stay at 3.5 where she will be competitive.
She is not on a community based team as she states so should be able to find another team at 3.5

• Information provided does not support the Appeal
• APPL history of results does not support the Appeal

I am requesting a decrease from 3.65 so I can play on a 3.0 team for the following reasons:

1. As I understand that 0.2 was added to my original rating which places me above my team rating of 3.0-3.49. If you subtract that addition I would qualify to continue playing with my team which is what I’m requesting.
2. Age has a significant impact on athletic strength, endurance, flexibility and overall performance. Unlike younger players, our ability to improve in these areas drop due to the aging process. My abilities, endurance etc align me with players in the 3.0 group.
3. Since I barely make the cut to be in a 3.5 league I feel this exposes me to more potential injuries and frustrations of not being able to play well at a higher level, which will also frustrate my teammates.
4. When you are in a 65+ team most of them are formed in 55+ communities. We had one of the only senior teams not associated with a Senior community in the 3.0 bracket. It appears that there are only a few teams in the 3.5 bracket that are not part of a senior community and they are on the other side of town which would eliminate my desire to play due to distance and easy accessibility to teams.
5. Because some players had injuries and were not able to play I filled in several times for those players which resulted in 10 total matches/30 games. I am wondering if that could have impacted my final index score
Thank you for your consideration on this matter.
June Gill