Displaying 1 - 25 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
17869East ValleyAmyRounds3.313.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE to 3.5

Won all her games in 2024 @3.5 18+ and split ONE
Dominated at 3.0
Young player, strong and moving up

No games in 2025
17864East ValleyJeffreyJacobs3.353.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE Greg M Agrees

Played Casa Grande with a 3.87 Current rating
Played '23 East valley 3.5
Played MXD and Doubles 3.5 in 2025
60 W 36 L 62%wins 886:732
DUPR 3.695
17850East ValleyFemmeSessions3.12.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE APPEAL Greg M agrees

75 yr old playing 65+ wants to go TO 2.5 from 3.1.
DID NOT dominate @2.5
LOST majority of games @ 2.5 and split a few @ 2.5
12 :12
Femme is where she need to be
17853East ValleyKathyReam3.834.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE 3.83 to 4.0. Greg M agrees

Played 4.0 teams for 2 years
and Tournaments 80% medaled
Went from 4.20 to 3.83
Competitive @ 4.0
.02 from FAST TRACK AND ONLY because of her LASt game
17966East ValleyDonnaVarnell2.943.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE

ONLY .06 FROM 3.0

PLAYED SCOTTSDALE LEAGUE IN 2025
3.2 RATING IN THIS LEAGUE
PLAYED ON 3.0 TEAM IN 2024
17931East ValleyMichelleFord4.54.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE

Michelle barely went over 4.5 with a 4.51
She won 64% of her games and lost 36%
She did not dominate at 4.0
Michelle is 66 and playing on 65+ team that finished 3/4 in that division.
Michelle has a bad knee and lists several PT appts, MRI and steroid injections.. her knee has not been replaced yet so she feels playing at a higher level could be a safety issue for her.
I feel we give her another year at 4.0, see how she plays out this season and gets her knee replacement .
17895East ValleyDianneBirgenheir2.873.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE

Dianne played 2.5/3.0 division in 2025

Won some, lost some and split some

She should be consistent at 3.0 and competitive.
17861East ValleyKarenTurnlund3.924.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE

3.92 to 4.0
Could have done a FAST TRACK
17855East ValleyAnnieKloss3.924.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

YES APPROVE

3.92 to 4.0

COULD have done FAST TRACK

STate Champs @3.5
Played all matches at state
18126West ValleyMikiDammarell2.963.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Won 73%
Dominated 2.5

Approve
18922West ValleyKariAnderson3.474.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

wins 9
losses 33
performance declined in 2025 in 4.0
probably best in 3.5

Decline and encouraged to submit an appeal to 3.5

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18299West ValleyRodrigoPerez-Zambrano3.64.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

w-7 Lost 11
2025 first season. Roster rating at 3.70 went down to 3.6

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18052West ValleyLupeShepard3.814.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

W 7, L 17 in 2025 season
APPL Index declined last 2 seasons

DUPR presented has only 4 games and 1% reliability

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
19098West ValleySherryHarleman3.583.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

w 3, l- 18
had surgery
2025 first year, probably should have started at 3.0
18292West ValleyDebbieAndrews3.274.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

w 21 l27

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18072SouthernTraceyRathjen3.343.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Tracey has a dupr of 3.896 and is .01 off of an auto appeal. She won 10 games and lost 14 she accrued 8 appl points while allowing only 3.

Tracey may have lost quite a few games but actually split 6 of those 14 losses. Only once did she actually go over 3.5 last season but I feel that her dupr and the close number to the auto appeal should allow the appeal to be approved
17757SouthernSandraHubbard3.333.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

This player has steadily declined since her start at 3.7 in 2024. She ended the mixed season in 2024 at 3.24. 2025 she played gender doubles and only raised her rating by .09. She played six matches all with the same partner. They won 14 games and lost 22. They scored 4 appl points in their 22 losses and allowed 8 appl points in their 14 wins. Her dupr rating is 3.239 and she has no history in pickleball brackets. I do not believe that the fact that she disagrees with her rating is sufficient to warrant and increased rating for appeal to 3.5

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17938SouthernJamesA Strickland2.783.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

This one was a real pain. I had to look up every single person played as there is no indication within the rating if they were the 18+ team.....ugh

As a 50+ player. He won 15 games, lost 23
Earned 12 appl points and allowed 6.

Against the 18+ he won 2 games, lost 8
Earned 3 appl points and allowed 2

This player was born in 1961 In his losses he lost 1 game to players born in 1976 and 1979
2 games to players born in 1993 and 1966
and 2 games to players born in 1970 and 1969
He lost one game to players born in 1990 and 2000

3 of his games lost were to people less than 10 years younger than him.

In the 18+ matches his rating dropped a total of .15. Added back into his final rating that brings him to a 2.93. Enough for an auto appeal.

18068West ValleyMonteWilliams4.464.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

System issue? started 4.0 at a 4.52 APPL Index

Above 4.5 all season except last 2 games
17880SouthernSuzanneRichards2.83.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

suzanne started at the given rate of 3.2 and ended at 2.8. Her rating progressed steadily downward.
Mixed play
6 wins 18 losses
appl points scored 5 appl points allowed 1
womens
5 wins 13 losses
appl points scored 7 appl points allowed
The suzanne richards that is 72 as our appl states does not have a pb brackets rating. Her dupr is 2.943 which comes only from a ladder league within her community and no tournament play

she states she has rotator cuff issues.
I don't recommend approval

  • Duplicate Appeal
18287SouthernSueLinton3.573.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Sue is a 3.57 player who is asking to play down to a 3.0. She is 75 years old and wants to play doubles with her husband who is a 3.0 and is 82 years old. She was quite sick this past spring and has had a hard time recovering.

Sue and her husband played together last year in 30 games. They won 22 and lost 8. They gained 6 Appl points and allowed 12.

Sue's rating bobbed around all year going between the 3.37 she started with and peaked for one game at 3.6 before going back to a 3.55. While she was over 3.5 most of the season it was usually 3.51, 3.55.... she only hit 3.6 at one time and only for one game of one match.

While her husband COULD play up on a 3.5 team due to his age, his ratings are continuously low 3.2.

with that being said, is she better than 3.0 yes, at 75 playing a a 65+ should that give her some grace when she plays with an 82 year old partner.....

My feelings are if they are husband and wife and can even stand to play together on the same side.... they must be amazing people. I would vote yes based on age. But I realize I am pretty tenderhearted when it come to things like this.

17958SouthernJohnPieri4.013.5RejectedWorkflow Complete

Started season at 4.01 in 3.5 division. Never dropped below 4.0. He was the only 4.0 in all the matches.

State
9 win, 3 losses
2 appl earned and 4 appl allowed

regular season
10 regular wins, 2 regular loses
against mixed age split matches evenly with 3 wins and 3 losses against 18 +

bottom line is he wants to likely play on a 65+ team of 3.5. Final rating is 4.09 not 4.01

He seems to have dominated at 3.5 last year even 50/50 against the open age guys.

While his rating didn't go up a ton 4.01 to 4.09 he played with players with much lower level ratings all year.

DUPR is 3.6 put only one game

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17780West ValleyLisaDeminsky2.773.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Should have submitted a Fast Track. I approved rather then asking them to resubmit - same outcome.
17773West ValleyHoo YinWong3.824.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Should have submitted a Fast Track. I approved rather than asking them to resubmit — outcome is the same.
17826West ValleyJulieTisue3.804.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Should have been a Fast track. Julie played 4.0 last season.
I approved rather than asking her to resubmit — outcome is the same.
 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason