Displaying 1 - 25 of 306

 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason
19313West ValleyDoreneGreene23.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
19248East ValleyBradCox2.243.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

Won 25
lost 17

375 won
323 lost

9ppg

Brad fits and is competitive at 3.0

18722West ValleyNatalieBoles2.262.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
18723West ValleyNatalieBoles2.262.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
18753West ValleyNatalieBoles2.262.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
  • Duplicate Appeal
18715West ValleyLynneAiken2.332.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
18740West ValleyDelynnMurray2.493.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Did not play in 2025
Self rating through appeals process

17753East ValleyJudyCantrill2.503.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

REJECT 2.71 TO 3.0

Played 3.0 2025
11 W/31 L
290 : 423 POINTS
Can play exception and see where rating goes in "26

17790SouthernSherryElwood2.53.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Deny this appeal. Player qualifies for a fast track appeal. Rating is 2.85. Told her this and asked her to submit a fast track appeal. 8/4/25

or approve this one

17866SouthernJeannieAntonucci2.53.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Jeannie had heart surgery. She was listed on a roster but never played a game. She has no other appl history. There is a jeannie Antonnuci in DUPR but no identifiers to know if it was her. Her PBB is 2.875

I told her she needed to do a self ratings assessment and turn it into her captain. They could then choose to add her or not. I said this appeal would be denied as there is no information to support the request.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18050West ValleyKatieFender2.53.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete
18082West ValleyKathleenHuntington Cook2.53.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Actual APPL Index is 2.97
Played 3.0 last season - qualifies for FAST Track

18222SouthernMichelleMarrs2.53.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

Michelle Marrs was unable to play any matches last year even though she was rostered on the 3.0 team. Her father was ill and passed away and she was his caretaker. She practiced with the team when she was in town. She has applied for a medical appeal.
She would like to remain on the 3.0 team.
I would like to grant the appeal due to the fact that she was caring for a dying family member and never got a chance to prove herself.

She has no ratings at this time of any kind.

  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18851East ValleyjohnBahlenhorst2.53.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE

John should be SELF RATING at 3.5. He has not played APPL since '23 and missed the box to self rate in registering.

19360West ValleyLoriJuscius2.52.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete
19441East ValleyJulieMiller2.504.0ApprovedWorkflow Complete

APPROVE
SELF RATE 4.0

Was on a team 2025 But could not play any games because of injuries.
Her rating reverted to 2.5 with no games played

19610East ValleyJohnReed2.53.5PendingRoster Rating Appeal Approve/Reject

Duplicate appeal

  • Duplicate Appeal
19611East ValleyJohnReed2.53.5ApprovedWorkflow Complete

Approve
Self rate 3.5

19686SouthernAarynGiblin2.53.0PendingRoster Rating Appeal Review
17848East ValleyTrishKossick2.543.0RejectedWorkflow Complete

REJECT 2.54 to 3.0
Started 3.2 as a new player with given INDEX and declined progressively to 2.54 from this original rating
Should be playing 2.5 or exception

  • Information provided does not support the Appeal
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
17836East ValleyLynRube2.614.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • Duplicate Appeal
19329West ValleySheriAnthenat2.633.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18088West ValleyHayleyUseldinger2.673.0RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18244West ValleyTerriMims2.683.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • APPL history of results does not support the Appeal
18245West ValleyTerriMims2.683.5RejectedWorkflow Complete
  • Duplicate Appeal
 Entry ID Region First Last APPL Index Appeal To Workflow Status Workflow Step Internal Review Notes Reject Reason