Roster Rating Standard Appeal

YES APPROVE

ONLY .06 FROM 3.0

PLAYED SCOTTSDALE LEAGUE IN 2025
3.2 RATING IN THIS LEAGUE
PLAYED ON 3.0 TEAM IN 2024

Kim's rating is .01 off a fast track appeal. Wants to appeal to 3.5

Over the past couple of years of play her rating has kind of danced all around the 3.2, 3.3 range. Never over a 3.5

When she played mixed her losses were 17 compared to 7 wins, 4 appl points earned and 8 allowed. That is a 41% win ratio in mixed.

In gender doubles she was 50/50. She had five wins and five losses. She earned 4 appl points and allowed to.

She speaks of two really dominant mixed teams and when I look at them I do see players that play 4.0 regularly in tournaments etc. That might account for the 41% ratio.

She played in 50+ in both of those even though she qualified for 65+. I don't know if it is because Tubac only has 'x' number of teams available.

I have reached out to Naomi Giles from Green Valley to see if she has an opinion on, or knows her play. No response

She is qualified to play on a 65+ team if one is available in Tubac. Limited teams available there. I would be inclined keep her playing and say yes.

She has 14 DUPR matches in 2024. 3.668

LC states that her team was in a weak division and finished toward the bottom.

Only went over 3.5 in last 2 games

Approve

dominated 4.0

started season in 4.0 at an APPL Index of 4.5

Reject

• APPL history of results does not support the Appeal

Robert played 34 games last yea He lost 24 mens doubles matches, won 3. He lost 4 mixed double and won 3. He earned 6 appl points in mens doubles and allowed 2. He won 3 apple points in mixed and allowed two.

He struggled all year with leg issues eventually having surgery to correct it. He states that subs scores might have been attributed to him but I would have know way of knowing if this was accurate.

He played in 65+ last year and can do so again this year if he so chooses. In adding up all matches both doubles and mixed his average rating is a 2.9. I believe that he should be granted the appeal based on that, due to the unknown of whose scores are actually entered and no way to find out. If he chooses to play 65+ he is able to regardless.

Duper is 3.006

APPROVE 3.72 to 4.0
Liz stayed right at 3.9 mostly the entire 2025 season until the last 3 games.
Liz has a DUPR & UTPR over 4.0
Played 4.0 in 22/23/24/25 seasons
253 pts won : 362pts loss
Liz is where she needs to be at 4.0

George played 9 matches last year. He won 17 games and lost 10. He had 8 appl points earned and 6 allowed.

He played on a 65+ team and states he will be 72 this year. Three of the wins come due to a forfeit.

He states he has neuropathy in his feet and arthritis. His index is 4.01. He wants to play 3.5 again due to the increasing pain levels. He has disabled plates on his car he states.

It appears Saddlebrook adds their APPL matches into Dupr. His dupr is 4.42 HOWEVER there are only two appl matches in it that are fairly current and one has not been validated. The other ratings come from 2022.

Since he will be playing in the 65+ league I recommend we approve the rating of 3.5 as he is only 4.01 and the highest he got last year was 4.05. Neuropathy makes it very hard to play so I don't feel he has any advantage.

only played 2 matches in 2025 due to her work schedule.
did not play in 2024 - rating too high.
for 2025 self rating, using Appeal to change Roster rating since she has a historical rating

System issue? started 4.0 at a 4.52 APPL Index

Above 4.5 all season except last 2 games

Tracey has a dupr of 3.896 and is .01 off of an auto appeal. She won 10 games and lost 14 she accrued 8 appl points while allowing only 3.

Tracey may have lost quite a few games but actually split 6 of those 14 losses. Only once did she actually go over 3.5 last season but I feel that her dupr and the close number to the auto appeal should allow the appeal to be approved